Secondary School Teachers’ Beliefs about Grammar Teaching in Ethiopia
Abstract
This study intended to investigate EFL teachers’ beliefs about direct/explicit and indirect/implicit grammar instruction. A simple random sampling technique was applied to select 396 secondary school EFL teachers among those who were pursuing their M.A. studies in the summer program of five universities. Among these, 348 participants responded to a questionnaire consisting of 21 items adapted from Jean and Simard (2011) and from Borg and Burns (2008). Then an exploratory factor analysis was applied, and the test determined only 15 items that would address the two types (direct and indirect) of grammar instruction. The results indicated that the teachers believed that implicit grammar teaching was viable, but they favored the explicit grammar teaching in their context. The paired sample t-test result, t (347) = 5.655; p< .05; Cohen’s d = .95), revealed that the teachers had significantly stronger beliefs in the direct/explicit grammar instruction than in indirect/implicit grammar instruction. The two-way ANOVA results revealed that the participants’ beliefs about direct grammar instruction significantly differed (F (2, 346) = 14.120; p < .05, partial eta square= .076) as a function of teaching experience in favor of the group of the most experienced teachers, but their belief about indirect grammar instruction did not differ as a function of both teaching experience and level of school they taught. The findings suggest a possible tension and conflict between belief and practice in the grammar instructional process, given the strong impact of teacher beliefs on teaching behaviors as the literature confirmed. Recommendations have also been included considering the findings of the study.References
Ahmadi, F., & Shafiee, S. (2015). L2 teachersʼ and learnersʼ beliefs about grammar. International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World, 9 (1), 245-261.
Andrews, S. (2003). Just like instant noodles: L2 teacher and their beliefs about grammar pedagogy. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 9(4), 351-375.
Aytenew Tilaye. (2015). Exploring the Effects of Teachers' Beliefs about Grammar Teaching. Unpublished MA Thesis. Addis Ababa University.
Azad, M. A. (2013). Grammar Teaching in EFL Classrooms: Teachers’ Attitudes and Beliefs. ASA University Review, 7 (2), 111 – 125.
Basturkmen, H. (2012). Review of research into the correspondence between language teachers’ stated beliefs and practices. System, 40(2), 282-95.
Batstone, R. & Ellis, R. (2009). Principled grammar teaching. System, 37, 194–204.
Birhanu Simegn. (2012). A Study of Secondary School EFL Teachers’ Pedagogical Beliefs and Classroom Practices. Unpublished PhD Dissertation. Addis Ababa University.
Borg, S. & Burns, A. (2008) Integrating Grammar in Adult TESOL Classrooms. Applied Linguistics, 29 (3), 456–482.
Borg, S. (2003). Teacher cognition in language teaching: A review research on what language teachers think, know, believe and do. Language Teaching, 36, 81-109.
Burgess, J. & Etherington, S. (2002). Focus on grammatical form: Explicit or implicit. System, 30(4), 433-458.
Burns, A. (1992). Teacher beliefs and their influence on classroom practice. Prospect, 7(3), 56-65.
DeKeyser, R. (2003). Implicit and Explicit Learning. In C. J. Doughty, & M. H. Long (Eds.),The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition (pp. 312 – 348). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Dekeyser, R. M. (1995). Learning second language grammar rules: An experiment with a miniature linguistic system. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17(3), 379-410.
Denne-Bolton, R. (2001). English Language Teaching: The Criteria for Supporting ELT as Part of a VSO Country Programme.
Doughty, C. J. (2003). Instructed SLA: Constraints, Compensation, and Enhancement. In C. J. Doughty, & M. H. Long (Eds.), The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition (pp. 256-310). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Doughty, C., & Williams, J. (1998). Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Eisenstein-Ebsworth, M. & Schweers, C. W. (1997). What researchers say and practitioners do: Perspectives on conscious grammar instruction in the ESL classroom. Applied Language Learning, 8(2), 237-60.
Ellis, N. (2005). At the interface: Dynamic interactions of explicit and implicit language knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27(2), 305-352.
Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ellis, R. (2006). Current issues in the teaching of grammar: An SLA perspective. TESOL Quarterly, 40, 83–107.
Ellis, R. (2008a). The place of grammar instruction in the second/foreign curriculum. In E. Hinkel, & S. Fotos (Eds.), New perspectives on grammar teaching in second language classrooms (pp. 17-34). New York: Routledge.
Ellis, R. (2008b). Methodological options in grammar teaching materials. In E. Hinkel, & S. Fotos (Eds.), New perspectives on grammar teaching in second language classrooms (pp. 155-179). New York: Routledge.
Ellis, R., Basturkmen, H., & Loewen, S. (2001). Preemptive focus on form in the ESL classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 35 (3), 407-420.
Farrell, T. & Lim, P. (2005). Conceptions of grammar teaching: A case study of teachers’ beliefs and classroom practices. TESL-EJ, 9(2), 1-13.
Fotos, S.S. (1994). Integrating grammar instruction and communicative language use through grammar consciousness-raising tasks. TESOL Quarterly. 28(2), 323-351
Girma Gezahegn (2005). A Study of Secondary School English Language Teachers’ Implementation of Methodological Innovation: The Teaching of Grammar in Focus. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, Addis Ababa University.
Habtamu Adem.(2011). Teachers' and Students‟ Perceptions of Effective Grammar Teaching. Unpublished MA Thesis. Addis Ababa University.
Haregewoine Abate (2007). The Effect of Communicative grammar on the Grammatical Accuracy of Students‘ Academic Writing: An Integrated Approach to TEFL. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, Addis Ababa University.
Harley, B. (1998). The role of focus-on-form tasks in promoting child L2 acquisition. In C Doughty & J Williams (eds). Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Janfeshan, K. (2017). Iranian EFL teachers' beliefs about how to teach English Grammar. Brazilian English Language Teaching Journal, 8 (2) 335-354
Jean, G., & Simard, D. (2011). Grammar teaching and learning in L2: Necessary, but boring? Foreign Language Annals, 44, 467-494
Kagan, D. (1992). Professional growth among preservice and beginning teachers. Review of Educational Research, 62(2)
Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. New York: Pergamon Press.
Krashen, S. (1999). Seeking a role for grammar: A review of some recent studies. Foreign Language Annals, 32, 245-257.
Li, L., & Walsh, S. (2011). Seeing is believing: Looking at EFL teachers’ beliefs through classroom interaction. Classroom Discourse, 2(1), 39-57.
Long, M. (1991). Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. In K. De Bot, R Ginsberg & C Kramsch (eds). Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Long, M. H. (2001). Focus on form: a design feature in language teaching methodology. In C. N. Candlin and N. Mercer (Ed.). English language teaching in its social context. (pp. 44-74). New York: Routledge.
Mathews, R. C., Buss, R. R., Stanley, W. B., Blanchard-Fields, F., Cho, J. R., & Druhan, B. (1989). The role of implicit and explicit processes in learning from examples: A synergistic effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15(6), 1083-1100.
Mengistie Shiferaw. (2019). Teachers’ philosophies and practices of teaching grammar: the case of Grade 7 EFL teachers of Azezo Primary School. International Journal of Development in Social Sciences and Humanities, 8, 36-52
MoE [Ministry of Education]. (1997a). English for Ethiopia: Grade 11 Students’ Book. Addis Ababa: Institute of Curriculum Development and Research (ICDR).
MoE [Ministry of Education]. (1997b). English for Ethiopia: Grade 11 Teacher’s Book. Addis Ababa: Institute of Curriculum Development and Research (ICDR).
MoE [Ministry of Education]. (2011). English for Ethiopia: Student Textbook Grade 11. Essex: Pearson Education Limited.
Nassaji, H. & Fotos, S. (2004). Current Developments in Research on the Teaching of Grammar. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 24, 126-145.
Nassaji, H. & Fotos, S. (2011). Teaching Grammar in Second Language Classrooms: Integrating Form-Focused Instruction in Communicative Context. New York: Routledge.
Nazari, A. & Allahyar, N. (2012). Grammar teaching revisited: EFL teachers between grammar abstinence and formal grammar teaching. Australian Journal of Teachers Education, 37(2), 73-87.
Norris, J. & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction. A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50 (3), 417–528. doi:10.1111/0023-8333.00136
Nurusus, E., Abdulsamad, A., Abdulrahman, S., Noordin, N. & Rashid, J. (2015). Exploring Teachers’ Beliefs in Teaching Grammar The English Teacher, XLIV (1), 23-32.
Önalan, O. (2018) Non-Native English Teachers’ Beliefs on Grammar Instruction. English Language Teaching, 5 (1) 1-13
Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers' beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307-332. doi:10.2307/1170741
Paradis, M. (1994). Neurolinguistic aspects of implicit and explicit memory: Implications for bilingualism and SLA. In N. C. Ellis (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages (pp. 393–420). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Peacock, M. (2001). Preservice ESL teacher' beliefs about second language learning: A longitudinal study. System, 29, 177-195.
Phipps, S. & Borg, S. (2009). Exploring tensions between teachers’ grammar teaching beliefs and practices. System, 37, 380-390.
Richards, J. C. (2008). Accuracy and Fluency Revisited. In E. Hinkel and S. Fotos (eds.), New Perspectives on Grammar Teaching in Second Language Classrooms. (pp. 34 - 41) New York: Routledge.
Richards, J. C., & Lockhart, C. (1994). Reflective teaching in the second language classroom. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Rosa, R. & O'Neill, M. (1999). Explicitness, intake, and the issue of awareness. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21(4), 511-556.
Rosales, E. F. & Coronel, J. M. (2017). Grammar in the Contemporary L2 Classroom: Teachers’ Beliefs and its Relationship with Teachers’ Grammar Competencies. International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research, 35 (1), 222-232.
Schulz, R. A. (1996). Focus on form in the foreign language classroom: students' and teachers' views on error correction and the role of grammar. Foreign Language Annals, 29, 343–364.
Schulz, R. A. (2001). Cultural differences in student and teacher perceptions concerning the role of grammar instruction and corrective feedback: USA- Colombia. Modern Language Journal, 85, 244-258.
Smith, D. B. (1996). Teacher decision making in the adult ESL classroom. In D. Freeman & J. C. Richards (eds.), Teacher Learning in Language Teaching (pp. 197−216). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Spada, N. & Lightbown, P. (2008). Form-focused instruction: Isolated or integrated? TESOL Quarterly, 42, 181-207.
Spada, N. 2011. Beyond form-focused instruction: Reflection on past, present and future research. Language Teaching, 44 (2), 225–236.
Swan, M. (2011). Grammar. In J. Simpson (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Applied Linguistics, (pp. 557–570). London: Routledge.
Tabachnick & Fidell (2006). Using Multivariate Statistics (5th ed.), New York: Pearson Education.
TGE [Transitional Government of Ethiopia]. (1994). Education and Training Policy. Ministry of Education . Addis Ababa.
Widodo, H. (2006). Approaches and procedures for teaching grammar English teaching. Practice and Critique, 5 (1), 122-141,
Woods, D. (1996). Teacher cognition in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zewudie Tamiru. (2017). Teachers’ Beliefs and Practices of Teaching Grammar: The Case of Two EFL Teachers in Ethiopia. English for Specific Purposes World, 19 (53), 1-22.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
