Gender Similarities in High School Mathematics: Affective and Cognitive Aspects

  • Negasi Hagos Tekola Aksum University
  • Dawit Asrat Getahun Bahir Dar University
  • Hailu Hagos WHEAT Mentor Support Trust; Global Knowledge Exchange Network (GKEN) member, London, UK
Keywords: Mathematics, self-efficacy, teacher affective support, achievement, gender

Abstract

The study investigated gender similarities in perceived teacher affective support, mathematics self-efficacy, and mathematics achievement by using quantitative research design. Data were collected by self-report questionnaire and achievement test from 727 (416 females & 311 males) grade 9 students, with average age of 15 years, randomly selected from three government general secondary schools in Aksum. Data gathering tools had acceptable reliability coefficients; 0.80 for teacher affective support scale and 0.93 for mathematics self-efficacy scale. Descriptive statistics and independent samples t-test were used to analyze the data. The findings revealed that there were gender similarities in teacher affective support and mathematics achievement while girls found to be more self-efficacious towards mathematics. The findings can be practically used to realize successful high school mathematics teaching-learning by selecting student outcomes, designing teacher and school manager training programs, and developing curricular materials in line with the findings. Mathematics teachers in particular can practically use the findings to enhance good insights in students, successfully support their students, and can work on improving mathematics self-efficacy and thereby enhance learning and achievement in mathematics for all students. Theoretically, the study confirmed Hyde’s (2005) gender similarity hypothesis and this investigation in the Ethiopian high school mathematics context contributes to the contested research in gender and mathematics which could contribute to the theories in educational psychology. Further implications and directions for future study are forwarded.

Author Biographies

Negasi Hagos Tekola, Aksum University
PhD Candidate Department of Psychology College of Education and Behavioral Sciences Bahir Dar University
Dawit Asrat Getahun, Bahir Dar University
Associate Professor Department of Psychology College of Education and Behavioral Sciences Bahir Dar University
Hailu Hagos, WHEAT Mentor Support Trust; Global Knowledge Exchange Network (GKEN) member, London, UK
Executive director of WHEAT Mentor Support Trust; Global Knowledge Exchange Network (GKEN) member, London, UK

References

Abraha Asfaw (2015). Quality of primary education in Ethiopia: The case of early grade mathematics competency in Tigrai. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia.

Adula Bekele & Kassahun Melesse (2010). Enactment of student-centered approach in teaching mathematics and natural sciences: The case of selected general secondary schools in Jimma zone, Ethiopia. Ethiop. J. Educ. & Sc., 5(2), 29-50.

Arnup, J. L., Murrihy, C., Roodenburg, J., & McLean, L. A. (2013). Cognitive style and gender differences in children’s mathematics achievement. Educational Studies, 39(3), 355–368.

Ayalon, H. & Livneh, I. (2013). Educational standardization and gender differences in mathematics achievement: A comparative study. Social Science Research, 42, 432-445.

Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28(2), 117-148.

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: W. H. Freeman and Company.

Bandura, A. (2006a). Adolescent development from an agentic perspective. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.), Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents (pp. 1–43). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.

Bandura, A. (2006b). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.), Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents (pp. 307–337). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.

Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V., & Pastorelli, C. (2001). Self-efficacy beliefs as shapers of children's aspirations and career trajectories. Child Development, 72(1), 187-206.

Betz, N. E. & Hackett, G. (1983). The relationship of mathematics self-efficacy expectations to the selection of science-based college majors. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 23,329-345.

Byrnes, J. P. (2005). Gender differences in math: Cognitive processes in an expanded framework. In A. M. Gallagher & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), Gender differences in mathematics: An integrative psychological approach (pp. 73-98). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Byrnes, J. P., Hong, L., & Xing, S. (1997). Gender differences on the math subtest of the Scholastic Aptitude Test may be culture-specific. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 34, 49–66.

Camfield, L. (2011). ‘A girl never finishes her journey’: mixing methods to understand female experiences of education in contemporary Ethiopia. Research Papers in Education, 26(4), 393–412.

Caplan, J. B. & Caplan, P. J. (2005). The perseverative search for sex differences in mathematics ability. In A. M. Gallagher & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), Gender differences in mathematics: An integrative psychological approach (pp. 25-47). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Caprara et al. (2008). Longitudinal analysis of the role of perceived self-efficacy for self-regulated learning in academic continuance and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(3), 525–534.

Catsambis, S. (2005). The gender gap in mathematics: Merely a step function? In A. M. Gallagher & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), Gender differences in mathematics: An integrative psychological approach (pp. 220-245). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Chen, P. & Zimmerman, B. (2007). A cross-national comparison study on the accuracy of self-efficacy beliefs of middle-school mathematics students. The Journal of Experimental Education, 75(3), 221-244.

Chipman, S. F. (2005). Research on the women and mathematics issue: A personal case history. In A. M. Gallagher & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), Gender differences in mathematics: An integrative psychological approach (pp. 1-24). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Cortina, J. M. (1993). What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(1), 98-104.

Ellemers, N. (2018). Gender stereotypes. Annual Review of Psychology, 69(1), 275-298.

Else-Quest, N. M., Hyde, J. S., & Linn, M. C., (2010). Cross-national patterns of gender differences in mathematics: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136(1), 103–127.

Eshetie Abebe (2001). Gender differences in mathematics achievement as a function of math self-efficacy and math anxiety among Bale Zone high school students. Unpublished MA Thesis, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Eshetu Asfaw, Dilamo Otore, Tesfaye Ayele, & Zinabu Gebremariam (2009). An option paper presented at the Technical Workshop on Science and Mathematics Secondary Education in Africa (SEIA) Follow-up Program. January 29 – February 06, Tunis, Tunisia.

Fast et al. (2010). Does math self-efficacy mediate the effect of the perceived classroom environment on standardized math test performance? Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 729–740.

FDRE Ministry of Education (MoE, 2001). Education statistics annual abstract 1993 E.C. (2000/2001 G.C). Addis Ababa: Ministry of Education.

FDRE Ministry of Education (MoE, 2002). The education and training policy and its implementation. Addis Ababa: Ministry of Education.

FDRE Ministry of Education (MoE, 2005). Education Sector Development Program III (ESDP III) 1998 - 2002 E.C. (2005/06 - 2010/11 G.C): Program Action Plan. Addis Ababa: Ministry of Education.

FDRE Ministry of Education (MoE, 2015a). Education Sector Development Program V (ESDP V) 2008 - 2012 E.C. (2015/16 - 2019/20 G.C): Program Action Plan. Addis Ababa: Ministry of Education.

FDRE Ministry of Education (MoE, 2015b). Education statistics annual abstract 2006 E.C. (2013/2014 G.C). Addis Ababa: Ministry of Education.

FDRE Ministry of Education (MoE, 2018). Education statistics annual abstract 2009 E.C. (2016/2017 G.C). Addis Ababa: Ministry of Education.

Federal Democratic Republic Government of Ethiopia (FDRGE, 1994). Education and training policy. Addis Ababa, ST. George Printing Press.

Field, A. (2005). Discovering statistics using SPSS (2rd ed.). London: SAGE Publications Inc.

Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Inc.

Frenzel, A. C., Pekrun, R., & Goetz, T. (2007). Girls and mathematics a “hopeless†issue? A control value approach to gender differences in emotions towards mathematics. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 22(4), 497-514.

Gallagher, A. M. & Kaufman, J. C. (2005). Gender differences in mathematics: What we know and what we need to know. In A. M.

Gallagher & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), Gender differences in mathematics: An integrative psychological approach (pp. 316-331). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Gravetter, F. J & Wallnau, L. B. (2013). Statistics for the behavioral sciences (9th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.

Hackett, G. & Betz, N. E. (1989). An exploration of the mathematics self-efficacy/mathematics performance correspondence. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 20, 261-273.

Holm, M. E., Hannula, M. S., & Björn, P. M. (2016). Mathematics-related emotions among Finnish adolescents across different performance levels. Educational Psychology, DOI: 10.1080/01443410.2016.1152354.

Hyde, J. S. & Linn, M. C. (2006). Gender similarities in mathematics and science. Science, 314, 599-600.

Hyde, J. S. (2005). The gender similarities hypothesis. American Psychologist, 60(6), 581–592.

Hyde, J. S. (2007). New directions in the study of gender similarities and differences. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16(5), 259-263.

Hyde, J. S., Fennema, E., & Lamon, S. J. (1990). Gender differences in mathematics performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 139-155.

Hyde, J. S., Fennema, E., Ryan, M., Frost, L. A., & Hopp, C. (1990). Gender comparisons of mathematics attitudes and affect: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 14, 299-324.

Hyde, J. S., Lindberg, S. M., Linn, M. C., Ellis, A., & Williams, C. (2008). Gender similarities characterize math performance. Science, 321, 494–495.

Isiksal, M. & Cakiroglu, E. (2008). Gender differences regarding mathematics achievement: The case of Turkish middle school students. School Science and Mathematics, 108(3), 113-120.

Junge, M. E. & Dretzke, B. J. (1995). Mathematical self-efficacy gender differences in gifted/talented adolescents. Gifted Child Quarterly, 39(1), 22-26.

Karakolidis, A., Pitsia, V., & Emvalotis, A. (2016). Examining students’ achievement in mathematics: A multilevel analysis of the Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2012 data for Greece. International Journal of Educational Research, 76, 106-115.

Kenney-Benson, G. A., Patrick, H., Pomerantz, E. M., & Ryan, A. M. (2006). Sex differences in math performance: The role of children’s approach to schoolwork. Developmental Psychology, 42(1), 11–26.

Kline, P. (2000). The handbook of psychological testing (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.

Kyriakides, L. & Antoniou, P. (2009). Gender differences in mathematics achievement: An investigation of gender differences by item difficulty interactions. Educational Research and Evaluation, 15(3), 223-242.

Lasonen, J., Kemppainen, R., & Raheem, K. (2005). Education and training in Ethiopia: An evaluation of approaching EFA goals. Institute for Educational Research, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylän yliopisto, Finland.

Li, M., Zhang, Y., Liu, H., & Hao, Y. (2017). Gender differences in mathematics achievement in Beijing: A meta-analysis. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 1-18.

Lindberg, S. M., Hyde, J. S., Petersen, J. L., & Linn, M. C. (2010). New trends in gender and mathematics performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136(6), 1123-1135.

Maddux, J. E. (1995). Self-efficacy theory: An introduction. In J. E. Maddux (Ed.), Self-efficacy, adaptation, and adjustment: Theory, research, and application (pp. 3-33). New York, NY: Springer Science+Business Media.

Matsui, T., Matsui, K. & Ohnishi, R. (1990). Mechanisms underlying math self-efficacy learning of college students. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 37, 225-238.

Mehrens, W. A. & Lehmann, I. J. (1991). Measurement and evaluation in education and psychology (4th ed.). Belmont, USA, Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.

Method et al. (2010). Impact Assessment of USAID’s Education Program in Ethiopia 1994-2009. United States Agency for International Development by the Aguirre Division of JBS International, Inc.

Negasi Hagos Tekola (2009). The relationship among perception of mathematics classroom environment, intrinsic motivation, and academic achievement: The case of first year students in Faculty of Science, Addis Ababa University. Unpublished MA Thesis, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Pajares, F. (2002). Gender and perceived self-efficacy in self-regulated learning. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 116-125.

Pajares, F. (2005). Gender differences in mathematics self-efficacy beliefs. In A. M. Gallagher & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), Gender differences in mathematics: An integrative psychological approach (pp. 294-315). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Paris, S. G. & Byrnes, J. P. (1989). The constructivist approach to self regulation and learning in the classroom. In B. L. Zimmerman & D. H.

Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: theory, research, and practice (pp. 169-200). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.

Pastorelli et al. (2001). The structure of children’s perceived self-efficacy: A cross-national study. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 17(2), 87–97.

Penner, A. M. & Paret, M. (2008). Gender differences in mathematics achievement: Exploring the early grades and the extremes. Social Science Research, 37, 239–253.

Randhawa, B. S. & Gupta, A. (2000). Cross-national gender differences in mathematics achievement, attitude, and self-efficacy within a common intrinsic structure. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 15(2), 51-66.

Romberg, T. A. & Kaput, J. J. (1999). Mathematics worth teaching, mathematics worth understanding. In E. Fennema & T. A. Romberg (Eds.), Mathematics classrooms that promote understanding (pp. 3- 17). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Sakiz, G. (2007). Does teacher affective support matter? An investigation of the relationship among perceived teacher affective support, sense of belonging, academic emotions, academic self-efficacy beliefs, and academic effort in middle school mathematics classrooms. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.

Schunk, D. H. & Pajares, F. (2002). The development of academic self-efficacy. In A. Wigfield and J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation (pp. 15-31). California, San Diego: Academic Press, Inc.

Schunk, D. H., & Lilly, M. W. (1984). Sex differences in self-efficacy and attributions: Influence of performance feedback. Journal of Early Adolescence, 4, 203-213.

Seleshi Zeleke (1995). Gender differences in mathematics achievement as a function of attitudes in grades 8 through 11 (In Northern Shoa Region). Unpublished MA Thesis, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Seleshi Zeleke (2001). Gender differences in mathematics performance in the elementary grades: Implications for women’s participation in scientific and technical occupations. Eastern African Social Science Research Review, 27(2), 109-127.

Seleshi Zeleke (2005). Gender differences in mathematics performance among fifth and sixth grade children in Addis Ababa. The Ethiopian Journal of Education, XXV(1), 1-21.

Skaalvik, E. M. & Skaalvik, S. (2013). School goal structure: Associations with students’ perceptions of their teachers as emotionally supportive, academic self-concept, intrinsic motivation, effort, and help seeking behavior. International Journal of Educational Research, 61, 5–14.

Skaalvik, E. M., Federici, R. A., & Klassen, R. M. (2015). Mathematics achievement and self-efficacy: Relations with motivation for mathematics. International Journal of Educational Research, 72, 129-136.

Stiff, L.V., Johnson, J. L., & Johnson, M. R. (1993). Cognitive issues in mathematics education. In P. S. Wilson (Ed.), Research ideas for the classroom: High school mathematics (pp. 3-20). New York, NY: Macmillan Publishing Company.

Tesfaye Semela & Getachew A. Zeleke (2012). The affective side of mathematics education: Adapting a mathematics attitude measure to the context of Ethiopia. The Ethiopian Journal of Education, 32(1), 59-91.

Tilaye Kassahun (2004). Girls’ achievement in mathematics in the upper primary schools of Addis Ababa. The Ethiopian Journal of Education, XXIV(2), 67-100.

United Nations Development Programme (UNDP, 2018). Human development indices and indicators: 2018 statistical update. New York, NY: UNDP.

Yoo, Y. S. (2017). Modeling of factors influencing gender difference in mathematics achievement using TIMSS 2011 data for Singaporean eighth grade students. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 1-14, DOI: 10.1080/02188791.2017.1334626.

Zeldin, A. L., Britner, S. L., & Pajares, F. (2008). A comparative study of the self-efï¬cacy beliefs of successful men and women in mathematics, science, and technology careers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(9), 1036–1058.

Published
2020-02-20
How to Cite
Tekola, N. H., Getahun, D. A., & Hagos, H. (2020). Gender Similarities in High School Mathematics: Affective and Cognitive Aspects. Bahir Dar Journal of Education, 19(2). Retrieved from http://journals.bdu.edu.et/index.php/bje/article/view/118
Issue
Vol. 19 No. 2 (2019)
Section
Articles

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).