STEM Teachers’ Preferred Instructional Methods and Challenges Associated with Implementing STEM Education
Abstract
A large body of research has investigated teachers’ preferences for general teaching methodologies. However, relatively little research has been previously reported about the preferred instructional methods of STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics) teachers and their challenges in implementing STEM education at Bahir Dar STEM center, Ethiopia. This study examined preferences of 36 STEM teachers for three themes defining their instructional methods in this study: integration, engineering design and collaboration, and the challenges faced in implementing STEM education. The study used questionnaire and a semi-structured interview. The results showed that integration instructional method was marked by the teachers as the highest threshold instructional method. On the contrary, engineering design was the least preferred. A one way ANOVA results also revealed that the teachers showed considerable variation in their instructional preferences. The participants identified students’ lack of motivation, poor laboratory facilities and lack of instructional materials as the top three challenges associated with implementing STEM subjects at the center. Drawn from the results, implications for further research and educational practices were proposed.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
