Effect of Fertilizer Application and Variety on Yield of Napier Grass (Pennisetum purpureum) at Melokoza and Basketo Special Districts, Southern Ethiopia

Tessema Tesfaye Atumo, Getinet Kebede Kalsa, Mesfin Gambura Dula

Abstract


In tropical countries, the demand for meat and milk production has been increasing at an alarming rate, which the production, in turn, is requiring sufficient energy and protein feed supply. Four Napier grass varieties (ILRI_16815, ILRI_16902, ILRI_16913, ILRI_15743) and four nitrogen, phosphorus and sulfur (NPS) fertilizer (0, 12.5, 25, 50 kg ha-1 N:P:S with a rate of 19% N:37% P2O5:7% S)  level were laid out in split-plot design at Basketo and Melokoza districts during 2018-2019 cropping seasons to evaluate agronomic and forage biomass yield performance. Data were collected for three consecutive harvestings each year to evaluate yield and agronomic parameters. NPS fertilizer application had no significant variation on growth and yield of Napier grass. In terms of plant height, ILRI_15743 is found to be a shorter variety that had a wider circumference covering the ground, better leaf to stem ratio and a higher number of tillers per plant. The plant height was varied for NPS fertilizer application and the higher plant was at 12.5 kg ha-1(72.2 cm) level. ILRI_16815 demonstrated as the longest 84.6 cm variety among others in the test which encompass higher dry matter yield. Dry matter yields highly correlated (P<0.001) with leaf length, leaf number per plant and green forage yield which have less association with circumference, leaf width and leaf to stem ratio. There was better yield recorded at Melokoza than Basketo and applying 12.5 kg ha-1 NPS fertilizer is economical in Napier grass production. Therefore, ILRI_16815 could be recommended with 12.5 kg ha-1 NPS fertilizer at Melokoza, Basketo and similar agro-ecology to have economical Napier grass yield.


Keywords


correlation; dry matter yield; leaf to stem ratio; NPS; Pennisetum purpureum

Full Text:

PDF HTML

References


Atumo, T. T. (2018). Evaluation of forage type cow pea (Vigna unguiculata L.WALP.) accessions for dry matter yield in lowlands of Southern Ethiopia. Forage Res, 44(2), 74-80. Retrieved from http://forageresearch.in/

Farrell, G., Simons, S., & Hillocks, R. (2002). Pests, diseases and weeds of Napier grass, Pennisetum purpureum: A review. Int. J. Pest Manag, 48, 39-48.

Halim, R., Shampazuraini, S., & Idris, A. (2013). Yield and Nutritive Quality of Nine Napier Grass Varieties in Malaysia. Mal. J. Anim. Sci., 16(2), 37-44.

Hani, E. A., Muna, H. A., & Eltom, A. E. (2006). The Effect of Nitrogen and Phosphorus Fertilization on Growth, Yield and Quality of Forage Maize (Zea mays L.). Journal of Agronomy, 5, 515-518. doi:10.3923/ja.2006.515.518

Heliso, M. F., Hibebo, D. K., Atumo, T. T., Tunkala, B. Z., & Dula, M. G. (2019). Evaluation of Desho Grass (Pennisetum Pedicellatum) Productivity under Different Fertilizer Combinations and Spacing at Gamo Gofa Zone, Ethiopia. J. Agric. Environ. Sci., 4(1), 50-59.

Kabirizi, J., Muyekho, F., Mulaa, M., Msangi, R., Pallangyo, B., Kawube, G., . . . al., e. ( 2015). Napier Grass Feed Resource: Production, Constraints and Implications For Smallholder Farmers in Eastern and Central Africa. Naivasha, Kenya: The Eastern African Agricultural Productivity Project.

Lowe, A., Thorpe, W., Teale, A., & Hanson, J. (2003). Characterisation of germplasm accessions of Napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum and P. purpureum× P. glaucum hybrids) and comparison with farm clones using RAPD. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol, 50, 121-132.

Maleko, D., Mwilawa, A., Msalya, G., Pasape, L., & Mtei, K. (2019). Forage growth, yield and nutritional characteristics of four varieties of napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum Schumach) in the west Usambara highlands, Tanzania. Scientific African, ScienceDirect, Elsevier, 6(e00214).

Mengistu, A., Kebede, G., Assefa, G., & Feyissa, F. (2016). Improved forage crops production strategies in Ethiopia: A review. Academic Research Journal of Agricultural Science and Research, 4, 285-296. doi:10.14662/ARJASR2016.036

Mhere, O., Maasdorp, B., & Titterton, M. (2002). Forage Production and Conservation Manual: Growing and ensiling annual and perennial forage crops suited to marginal and semi-arid areas of Southern Africa. Zimbabwe: DFID.

Negawo, A. T., Teshome, A., Kumar, A., Hanson, J., & Jones, S. C. (2017). Opportunities for Napier Grass (Pennisetum purpureum) Improvement Using Molecular Genetics: A review. Agronomy, 7(28), 1-21.

Nyambati, E. M., Muyekho, F. N., Onginjo, E., & Lusweti, C. M. (2010). Production, characterization and nutritional quality of Napier grass [Pennisetum purpureum (Schum.)] cultivars in Western Kenya. African Journal of Plant Science, 4(12), 496-502.

SAS, I. I. (2011). Patent No. 0013402001. Cary, NS, USA.

Shapiro, B., Gebru, G., Desta, S., Negassa, A., Nigussie, K., Aboset, G., & Mechal, H. (2015). Ethiopia livestock master plan. ILRI Project Report. Kenya, Nirobi: International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI).

Upton, R. M. (1979). Farm management in Africa, the principal of production and planning. Oxford University Press.

Zailan, M. Z., Yaakub, H., & Jusoh, S. (2018). YIELD AND NUTRITIVE QUALITY OF NAPIER (PENNISETUM PURPUREUM) CULTIVARS AS FRESH AND ENSILED FODDER. The J. Anim. Plant Sci, 28(1), 63-72.

Zewdu, T. (2005). Variation in growth, yield, chemical composition and in vitro dry matter digestibility of Napier grass accessions (Pennisetum purpureum). Trop. Sci. , 45, 67-73.

Zewudu, T., Baars, R., & Alemu, Y. (2002). Effect of plant height at cutting, source and level of fertilizer on yield and nutritional quality of Napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum (L.) Schumach). Afr. J. Rang. Forag. Sci, 19, 123-128.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.