
J. Agric. Environ. Sci. Vol. 5 No 2 (2020) ISSN: 2616-3721 (Online); 2616-3713 (Print)
Publication of College of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, Bahir Dar University 74
3.3. Expenditure and own-price elasticities
Displayed in Table 7 are the expenditure and both
uncompensated and compensated own-price
elasticities for the considered food items. A good
can be identified as a necessity, luxury or Giffen
(inferior) based on the signs and size of the degree
of fluctuation of the elasticity value for a particular
commodity to a change in income. Generally, the
expenditure elasticities for the selected imported
food items in the country were high and this can be
explained by the economic situation in the country.
This revealed that most of the households
especially the poor face tight budgetary constraints
and all of the selected commodities are considered
to be very important because they fulfil their
fundamental needs.
The estimated expenditure elasticities of barley,
maize, millet, rice and wheat were 1.48, 1.36, 0.05,
0.93 and 0.74 respectively, indicating that a
10%increase in consumers‟ income would increase
the demand for the aforementioned commodities in
respective order by 14.8%, 13.6%, 0.5%, 9.3% and
7.4% (Table 7). The expenditure elasticity
estimates for coffee, tea, vegetables and roots and
tubers were 0.461, 0.064, 0.789 and 0.832
respectively, implying that a 10% increase in
consumers‟ income would increase the demand for
the above-mentioned commodities in respective
order by 46.1%, 0.64%, 5.89% and 8.32%. Besides,
the expenditure elasticity estimates of chicken meat
and mutton were 0.741 and 0.811 respectively,
imply that an increase in consumers‟ income by
10% would increase the demand for the former and
latter commodities by 7.41% and 8.11%
respectively.
However, the empirical evidence showed the
expenditure elasticity estimates of potatoes and
beef to be -0.150 and -0.31 respectively, indicating
that if consumers‟ income increased by 10% the
demand for the former and latter goods would
decrease by 1.50% and 3.1%. Therefore, for most
of the food items, any policy aimed at raising the
per capita income in the country, diversity towards
high-quality diet is likely to be enhanced.
A cursory review of the results showed a positive
expenditure elasticity estimates for all the food
items with the exception of potatoes and beef, thus
implying that potatoes and beef are non-normal
goods while the remaining are normal goods. The
empirical evidence showed potatoes and beef to be
income inelastic and negatively signed, that is, less
than zero, indicating they are inferior or Giffen
commodities. Furthermore, barley and maize were
found to be income elastic, that is, greater than
unity, implying they are luxury commodities, while
all the remaining food items have positive income
inelastic, that is, less than unity but greater than
zero, indicating that these food items are
necessities. However, it is worth to mention that
the expenditure elasticity values of millet and tea
were close to zero, indicating that these
commodities are near or close to inferior
commodity, that is, not as such sensitive to change
in expenditure.
The expenditure elasticity values for potatoes and
beef and all the remaining food items revealed that
if the consumers‟ income increased the demand for
the former would be decreased while that of the
later commodities would increase. Thus, it is
expected that these commodities will witness an
increase or decrease (potatoes and beef) in demand
when the increase in the income is in tandem with
the overall economic growth in the study area.
However, in relative terms, if the real per capita
income plummets, necessary commodities would
have less income allocated to them. Given a fixed
supply for normal goods, the upward shift of
demand curves will imply that the equilibrium
market prices will increase. For those commodities
whose own-prices are less than unity (inelastic), it
is anticipated that the increase in their respective
prices due to the shift in their respective demand
curves would lead to a decrease in the demand by
less than the proportionate change in price. Also,
for those food items whose own-elasticity values
are elastic i.e. greater than unity, it is anticipated
that the rise in their respective prices due to the
shift in their respective demand curves would lead
to a decrease in the demand by more than the
proportionate change in price. Thus, results show
that as consumers‟ income rise and consumers‟
diversify their diets, their consumption of non-
staple foods rather than staple foods tends to
increase.
An interesting observation was that coffee and tea
tend to have less expenditure elasticity. The
consumption of this commodity class (coffee and
tea) is relatively less affected by income changes
and can be inferred that it is a staple food in the
country, thus occupying a special place in the
consumers‟ diet.