Effect of Fish Offal Meal on Feed Intake, Growth Performances and Carcass Characteristics of Hubbard Classic Broiler Chicken Breeds

Samuel Kiflay, Gebeyehu Temesgen and Mengistie Taye*

College of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, Bahir Dar University, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia
Corresponding author: mengistietaye@yahoo.com

Received: April 5, 2018
Accepted: April 29, 2018

Abstract: The effect of partial substitution of full-fatted soybean poultry meal by fish offal meal in broiler chicks was investigated. The experiment had four treatment diets: diet-1(control, without animal protein); diet-2 (local fishmeal); diet-3 (fermented fish silage); and diet-4 (local tilapia meal). Treatment diets substituted the full-fatted soybean meal in the control diet at 5% level. Unsexed 180, one day old Hubbard Classic broiler chicks were randomly allocated tothe four treatment diets. Treatments had three replications of 15 birds per pen, in a completely randomized design. The experiment has three phases and lasted for 42 days. Overall, feed intake, body weight changes (BWC) and average daily body weight gain (ADG) were significantly (p < 0.05) affected by a diet that diet-1 was lower than fish offal based diets (diets 2, 3, and 4). During the starter period, birds in diet-1 and diet-4 had lower (p<0.05) BWC and ADG than diet 2 and 3. During the finisher period, birds in diet-4 had heavier (p< 0.05) BWC and ADG than diets 1 and 3. There was significantly (p< 0.05) better feed conversion ratio during the finisher period in diet-1 and diet-4 than the rest of the treatments. During the experimental period, higher mortality (p<0.05; 11.1%) was recorded in diet-1 than other diets. Diet-1 was lower in most of the carcass parameters studied. To conclude, regardless of fish species differences, incorporation of fish offal meal into plant-sourced protein diet improves the performance of broiler chicken. In addition, the results indicated that fish silage can also be an alternative to fishmeal.

Keywords: Feed conversion ratio, feed intake, fermented fish silage, local fishmeal

1. Introduction

Chicken population in Ethiopia is estimated about 50.38 million, of which 2.56% are crossbreds and 0.54% exotic breeds (CSA, 2013). Exotic chicken breeds that are selected especially for meat purpose are termed as broilers. Nowadays it is possible to get a 2 kg live weight broiler within 35 to 42 days, with only 3 kg of feed (Klasing, 2007; Choct, 2009). Feed contributes nearly 65-70% of the total running cost in modern chicken production. In relation to this, plant-sourced protein feed is becoming expensive in Ethiopia due to factors like oilseeds export, animal feed export, competition with human food and high processing cost (Gebremedhin et al., 2009; Hassen et al., 2009).Therefore, utilization of unconventional feed sources like fish offal meal in animal ration would benefit poultry production (Ristic et al., 2001; Agunbiade et al., 2004).

Fish production in Ethiopia, in 2001, was estimated to be 15,400 tons (FAO, 2003). An estimated maximum annual fish production level from Lake Tana was estimated to be 15,000 tons. According to Ann and colleagues, about 8 tons of frozen fillets (roughly 20 tons of whole wet fish) was obtained weekly from three sources of fish suppliers from Lake Tana, with considerable seasonal variation (Ann et al., 2007). In two-thirds of the year, this would amount to 680 tons of fish per annum (weight of whole wet fish).

Considering 60% of the fish weight as fish offal, 12 tons and 408 tons of fish offal (FO) can be generated on the weekly and yearly basis, respectively. Only one processing plant, throughout Amhara region, attempts to incorporate fishmeal into animal feed for sale. It collects fish offal once a week from only one of the three landing sites, excluding summer time. The remaining largest portion of the offal has been dumped around the shore contributing its share for environmental pollution. Summer rain, area of processing, processing cost and sanitation are important problems that have been encountered in fish meal processing in the region. Accordingly, alternative preparation of fish meal like Fermented fish silage can be considered to reduce pollution, storage costs, area of processing, initial capital and enables year-round production with simple technique (Windsor and Barlow, 1981; Sumarsih et al., 2010). Fermented fish silage is believed to have enzymes or bioactive peptides that may enhance growth and disease resistance of animals (Enes Dapkevicius et al., 2007; Garcia et al., 2007).This experiment was conducted to investigate the potential use of fish offal from Lake Tana as a protein supplement in broilers diets.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Description of the study area

The experiment was conducted at Zenzelma campus of Bahir Dar University, which is situated 6 km north of the regional capital Bahir Dar, with an elevation of 1912 meters above sea level, between latitude and longitude of 11°37'N and 37°29'E coordinates (Google-Earth, 2013). It is found in Bahir Dar Duria District, West Gojam zone. The average daily minimum and maximum temperatures were 7 °C and 29 °C, respectively. The mean annual rainfall is 1445 mm. Cattle, Goats, Cow’s milk, Chicken,and Egg are the main source of income from livestock. Lake Tana is located adjacent to Bahir Dar with an area of 3500 km2 with a mean depth of 9 meters, and a maximum depth of 14 meters. It is the largest freshwater lake in the country and the third in Nile Basin with a leading (80%) contribution to the Blue Nile River. It contributes about 20-31% of the total fish production potential of the country (Tesfaye, 1998; Wondie, 2010).

2.2. Experimental feed preparation

2.2.1. Experimental feed processing

Fish offal from three fish species such as tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus), catfish (Clarias garipienus) and Labeobarbus was collected from St. George fish cooperative, around Lake Tana, in Bahir Dar city, on January 04, 2014. The fish offal was prepared into three meal types: 1) Local fishmeal - a composition of three fish species (catfish, Labeobarbus, and tilapia) offal; 2) Fermented fish silage - a composition of three fish species (catfish, Labeobarbus and tilapia) offal and 3) Local tilapia meal made of only offal of tilapia species. Red kidney bean, soybean, corn, wheat bran, limestone, salt and noug seed cake (Guizotia abyssinica) were purchased from Bahir Dar area. General premix, Di-Calcium Phosphate, HCL- L-lysine and D-L methionine were purchased from Addis Ababa.

Local fishmeal and local tilapia meal preparation were following the same procedure. Based on Degebassa et al. (2008), about 50 kg of fish offal with 15 liters of water was put in an open barrel, minced, and heated to 95-100 °C over a period of 18-20 minutes. The cooked material was pressed to separate solids (press cake) from liquids (press liquor) in which oil and water were separated by settling (FAO, 2013). The pressed by-products were spread on a rack for sun drying for five consecutive days (Degebassa et al., 2008). Fermented fish silage was prepared by mincing the wet offal and boiled into a hot bowl at 115-120 °C for 5-10 minutes. Then, the boiled offal (60%) was put into a clean container with mixtures of malt (15%), molasses (5%), effective microbes (lactic acid bacteria; 5%) and sweet potato (15%) (Tibbetts et al., 1981). The silo (offal and starter) was then mixed and sealed in a plastic container, airtight. It was stirred, at least twice a day for the first two weeks and preserved for one-month duration. Finally, the semi-liquid silo was exposed to the sun for five days for drying (Al-Marzooqi et al., 2010).

Full-fatted soy and red kidney beans were processed in the same way, to remove trypsin inhibitors. The beans were submerged in cold water for 20 hours with occasional stirring and subsequently decanting the water and the mixture was brought to a boiling point at 100ºC for 30 minutes. The soaked beans were allowed to cool, sun-dried and ground.

2.2.2. Laboratory analysis

Representative samples of the experimental diets of local fishmeal, fermented fish silage, local tilapia meal and full-fatted soybean were sent to Bahir Dar University, the then Poly Campus, Food Science,and Technology Laboratory for chemical analysis. The samples were finely ground and sieved through 3 mm sieve with three replications each. The samples were analyzed for moisture, ash, crude protein, fat and carbohydrate (CHO) contents following the standard procedure (AOAC, 2000).

2.2.3. Feed formulation

The treatment rations were isocaloric and isonitrogenous with Metabolisable Energy for starter ranging from 3074 - 3086 and finisher 3198 - 3235 kcal kg-1DM. Average crude protein for starter ranges from 22.03 - 22.45 and finisher 20.08 - 20.18%. Energy was calculated using Wiseman (Wiseman, 1987): ME (kcal kg-1DM) = 3951 + 54.40 fat – 88.70 crude fiber – 40.80 ash. The ration was formulated as shown in Table 1.

2.3. Management of experimental birds

The experimental house was cleaned, washed with tap water and disinfected with formic acid. The house was left empty for twenty-four hours before placing the experimental birds. A total of 180, unsexed, one-day-old Hubbard Classic broiler chicks were purchased from Andasa Poultry Farm. Four treatment groups, each with three replications, having 15 birds in each pen (replication) were distributed randomly, with a completely randomized design (CRD). The feeding trial lasted for six weeks (42 days). The total area used by the experimental birds was 9.9m2. The birds were brooded with electric brooder of 200 Watt bulb for two weeks with 23 hours of light per day. The birds were reared on slatted floor covered with sawdust and teff straw, vaccinated against Newcastle at 1stand 7th day, and Gumboro at 14th day with Thermostable Newcastle and IBD vaccines, respectively. Birds were fed and watered ad-libitum. Feed leftover was collected and weighed daily for intake determination. The weight of birds was measured once every week, for seven times starting from one-day-old.

Table 1. Proportion of ingredients used in formulating broiler starter and finisher diets and chemical composition of treatment diets
Feed components
Treatment Diets
Starter (1-21 days) %
Finisher (22-42 days)%
Diet-1
Diet-2
Diet-3
Diet-4
Diet-1
Diet-2
Diet-3
Diet-4
Corn
30
32
32
32
40
44
44
44
Wheat bran
5
10
3
6
0
0
0
0
Full-fatted soybean
10
5
5
5
10
5
5
5
Full-fatted red kidney bean
24
20
25
23
24.4
22.4
19.4
20.4
Noug seed cake
26
23
25
24
22
20
23
22
Local fishmeal
0
5
0
0
0
5
0
0
Fermented fish silage
0
0
5
0
0
0
5
0
Local tilapia meal
0
0
0
5
0
0
0
5
General Premix1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Limestone
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
Di-calcium phosphate
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
1.50
1.50
1.50
1.50
Salt
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
L-lysine
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
DL- Methionine
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
Calculated composition (DM)
Dry Matter (DM)
90.91
90.93
90.84
90.0
90.50
90.48
90.37
90.44
Ether Extract (%)
4.19
4.17
3.93
4.04
4.39
4.47
4.36
4.44
Crude Protein (%)
22.25
22.03
22.45
22.2
20.18
20.16
20.08
20.12
Methionine (%)
0.60
1.25
1.14
0.56
0.43
1.10
1.25
0.40
Lysine (%)
1.57
3.60
3.80
1.66
0.74
2.75
2.99
5.52
Meth + Cyst
0.49
0.47
0.43
0.50
0.34
0.34
0.30
0.30
Crude Fiber (%)
8.30
7.76
7.73
7.67
7.21
6.52
6.99
6.83
Ca (%)
1.11
1.09
1.10
1.10
1.08
1.07
1.07
1.07
P (%)
1.19
1.10
1.13
1.12
1.01
0.95
0.95
0.95
ME(K. cal/kg)2
3074
3086
3086
3085.2
3212
3235.4
3198.2
3209.1
Note: ME= Metabolizable energy, Kcal/kg; Diet-1= control diet; Diet -2= Diet containing 5% Local fishmeal; Diet -3= Diet containing 5% Fermented fish silage; Diet -4= Diet containing 5% Local tilapia meal.1General premix inclusion rate in the diet; Vit A, 750,000IU; D3, 450,000IU; Alpha Toco acetate,1,000mg;Vit k 200mg;,vitB1, 100mg,B2,500mg;B6,150 mg;B12, 1mg;Biotin, 5mg; Nicotinic acid,2000mg,Folic acid 50mg;Panthothenic acid,900mg;choline chloride,1000mg; Ca336400.2mg, Iron (Fe) 2000mg, Iodine(I) 120mg, Cobalt (Co) 20mg, Copper (Cu) 500mg, Manganese (Mn) 8000mg, Zinc oxide (Zn) 5000mg, Selenium (Se) 20mg, Citric acid 250 mg. 2Metabolizable energy (ME) using Wiseman (Wiseman, 1987) formula: ME (kcal/kg) =3951 + 54.40 fat – 88.70 ash.

2.4. Data collection management

Feed intake was determined as the difference between the feed offered and refused collected every 24 hours. Individual birds were weighed weekly per pen base. The body weight change (BWC) of birds was calculated as the difference between the final and initial body weight. Average daily body weight gain (ADG) was calculated as the ratio of BWC to the number of experimental days. Feed conversion ratio (FCR) was computed as the ratio of daily feed intake to ADG. Mortality was recorded on-time and any abnormality was also monitored. At the end of the experiment, two birds per replication with body weight closer to the mean were starved overnight and weighed at slaughter for carcass evaluation using electronic weighing balance. They were killed by severing the jugular vein. Carcass evaluation was done following the procedures described by Kubena et al. (1974).Dressed carcass weight was measured after removing the blood and feather. Dressing percentage was calculated as the proportion of dressed carcass weight to slaughter weight multiplied by 100. Eviscerated carcass weight was determined after removing lower leg (shank), head, kidney, lung, pancreas, crop, proventriculus, small intestine, large intestine, ceca and urogenital tracts from the dressed carcass. The eviscerated percentage was determined as the proportion of the eviscerated weight to slaughter weight multiplied by 100. Fat around the proventriculus, gizzard, against the abdominal wall and the cloacae were collected and weighed. Fat percentage was calculated as the proportion of slaughter weight multiplied by 100. The edible organ parts, heart, gizzardand liver, were also weighed and expressed in percentage, in relation to slaughter weight.

2.5. Statistical analysis

The data collected from the experiment was initially fed to Excel sheet, and after checking the validity of the data it was analyzed with the General Linear Model (GLM) procedures of the Statistical Analysis System (SAS, 9.2) software. Significantly different treatment means were compared using Duncan’s multiple range tests.

3. Results

3.1. Chemical composition of feed ingredients

The chemical composition of treatment feeds of fish offal meals (local fishmeal, fermented fish silage,and local tilapia meal) and full-fatted soybean meal determined are presented in Table 2. The ash and crude protein contents were higher in fish offal meals than full-fatted soybean mean. The moisture, carbohydrate and fat contents were lower in fish offal meals than full-fatted soybean. The highest moisture content was observed in the fermented fish silage (7.34%) and full-fatted soybean meal (7.4%), and the least was in the local fishmeal (4.61%).

Table 2. Chemical composition (proximate analysis) of ingredients used in the experimental diet
Sample
Moisture (%)
ASH (%)
CP (%)
FAT (%)
CHO (%)
ME (Kcal/kg)
Fermented fish silage
7.34
21
41.37
15.02
15.28
3.908.30
Local tilapia meal
5.79
25.59
44.26
18.52
5.85
3,778.55
Local fishmeal
4.61
27.25
48.85
16.77
2.52
3,741.70
Full-fatted soybean
7.4
4.7
36.6
18.7
32.6
4,324.15
CP = crud protein; ME= Metabolizable energy calculated using Wiseman (Wiseman, 1987) formula: ME (kcal/kg) =3951 + 54.40 fat – 88.70 ash; CHO = carbohydrate content calculated as 100-moisture-ash-CP-fat in percent

3.2. Feed intake

The feed intake (FI) of experimental birds is shown in Table 3. Birds in diet-1 (81.98 g) had significantly lower (p<0.05) FI than the fish offal based diets during the finisher and overall experimental period. Birds in diet-3 (119.77 g) had the highest (p<0.05) FI during the finisher period. Figure 1 illustrates the linearly increasing trend of overall feed intake of birds during the experimental period.


Figure 1. The trend of feed consumption bird-1 day-1 across the experimental period

3.3. Body weight change

The final body weight (FBW) and ADG are presented in Table 3. During the starter period, birds in diet-3 (417.98 g) had the heaviest (p<0.05) FBW followed by those in diet-2 (384.44 g). During the finisher period, birds in diet-1 (1208.56 g) weighed significantly lower (p<0.05) than the rest of the treatment groups. During the starter period, ADG was higher (p<0.05) in diet-3 (17.78 g), followed by birds in diet-2. During the finisher period, ADG of birds in diet-4 were significantly (p<0.05) higher followed by diet-3. For the overall period, birds in diet-1 (41.7 g) obtained the least ADG (p<0.05).

3.4. Feed conversion ratio

The feed conversion ratio (FCR) of birds during the experimental period is summarized in Table 3. During the finisher period, FCR was significantly higher (p<0.05) for diet-1 and diet-4.For the overall period, FCR was the highest for birds in diet-3 while those indiet-4 had the lowest (p<0.05) FCR among the experimental diets.

3.5. Mortality rate and problems

The mortality rate of experimental birds was significantly higher (p<0.05) in diet-1 than the fish offal based meal fed birds (Table 3). For dead birds, stretching wings and heads back, reduced feed intake, opening the mouth, increased breathing and closing the eye were observed symptoms on the verge of their death. Deformity of phalanges and leg problem was observed in heavy birds feeding on fish offal based diets.

3.6. Carcass components

The mean weight of carcass components of experimental birds is presented in Table 4. There were significant differences (p<0.05) among the treatment diets for all the carcass parameters measured, with the exceptions for the eviscerated, liver and heart (p>0.05) weight percentages. Weight at slaughter was lower for diet-1 than fish offal based diets. Birds in diet-3 had the heaviest dressing percentage (91.82 %; p<0.05) than birds in diet-1. Fishmeal based diets (diet-2 and diet-4) produced the heaviest (p<0.05) abdominal fat accumulation followed by diet-3. Diet-2 was the heaviest (p<0.05) in gizzard weight, followed by diet-4. There was no significant difference (p>0.05) in all parameters between male and female experimental birds.

Table 3. The mean feed intake, body weight change, feed conversion efficiency and mortality rate of birds fed on different diets
Parameters
Treatment diets
Diet-1
Diet-2
Diet-3
Diet-4
P-value
FI (g/b/d)

Starter

31.75±2.07
36.56±2.41
39.53±2.61
34.56±2.21
0.118

Finisher

81.98±3.93c
114.62±5.54ab
119.77±4.94a
103.99±5.08b
0.001

Entire experiment

56.86±3.15b
75.59±4.61a
79.65±4.54a
69.27±4.15a
0.001
IBW (g/b)
44.52±0.05
44.73±0.06
44.8±0. 058
44.72±0.034
0.708
FBW (g)

Starter

332.89±6.16c
384.44±6.59b
418.22±6. 74a
335.13±8.73c
0.0001

Finisher

1208.56±7.77b
1499.81±24.43a
1518.75±18.79a
1492.27±19.81a
0.0001
BWC (g/b)

Starter

288.37±6.16c
339.71±6.59b
373.41±6.74a
290.41±8.73c
0.0001

Finisher

875.67±9.56c
1115.37±23.92ab
1100.53+18.11b
1157.14±20.84a
0.0001

Entire experiment

1164.04±7.77b
1455.08±24.43a
1473.95±18.79a
1447.55±19.81a
0.0001
ADG (g/b)

Starter

13.73±0.29c
16.18±0.32b
17.78±0.32a
13.83±0.42c
0.0001

Finisher

41.7±0.46c
53.11±0.14ab
52.41±0.86b
55.1±0.99a
0.0001

Entire experiment

27.72±0.19b
34.64±0.58a
35.09±0.45a
34.47±0.47a
0.0001
FCR (Feed: Gain)

Starter

2.33±0.15
2.26±0.06
2.22±0.01
2.51±0.13
0.287

Finisher

1.97±0.07b
2.16±0.06a
2.29±0.02a
1.89±0.05b
0.002

Entire experiment

2.05±0.04bc
2.19±0.06ab
2.27±0.02a
2.01±0.04c
0.008
Mortality rate
11.11±2.22a
2.22±2.22b
0b
4.44±2.22b
0.017
Diet-1= control diet; Diet -2= Diet containing 5% Local fishmeal; Diet -3= Diet containing 5% Fermented fish silage; Diet -4= Diet containing 5% Local tilapia meal. Means within a row with different superscripts differ significantly (P < 0.05); SEM: Standard error of the mean; ADG: Average Daily body weight Gain; BW: Body weight; IBW: Initial BW; FBW: Final BW; BWC: body weight change; FCR: Feed conversion ratio; FI: Feed intake.

Table 4. Carcass components and organ weights of broilers fed different fish offal based protein diets
Parameters
Treatment diets
sex
Diet-1
Diet-2
Diet-3
Diet-4
Male
Female
Slaughter wt.(g)
1024.1±9.79b
1383.72±1.62a
1390.7±14.52a
1377.5±9.34a
3020.8±49.16
1267.3±45.92
Dressing %
84.23±0.53b
85.8.8±0.8ab
88.49±1.69a
85.84±0.24ab
86.61±0.87
85.50±0.71
Eviscerated %
67.97±0.87
68.20±0.55
69.67±0.85
69.27±0.90
68.99±0.55
68.57±0.61
Abdominal Fat%
0.76±0.03c
0.98±0.02a
0.91±0.03b
1.01±0.03a
0.93±0.03
0.9±0.03
Liver wt (g) Liver %
2.29±0.11
2.18±0.07
2.11±0.09
2.25±0.06
2.20±0.05
2.22±0.06
Heart %
0.57±0.02
0.53±0.01
0.54±0.02
0.55±0.01
0.55±0.01
0.54±0.01
Gizzard %
1.63±0.07c
2.17±0.05a
1.53±0.05c
1.98±0.07b
1.87±0.08
1.78±0.09
Diet-1= control diet; Diet -2= Diet containing 5% Local fishmeal; Diet -3= Diet containing 5% Fermented fish silage; Diet -4= Diet containing 5% Local tilapia meal. Means in the same row with different subscripts are significantly different (P < 0.05).

4. Discussion

4.1. Chemical composition of feed ingredients

The higher ash content of fish offal meals than plant protein agrees with literature (Ojewola et al., 2005) that mineral-rich parts in fish offal, as bone, cartilage and scales increased the ash content. The relatively lower crude protein content in fermented fish silage might be due to the lower amount (only 60%) of fish offal input than the other fishmeal diets and the processing methods. Generally, the proximate analysis of this study is in line with previous reports on fish species of crude protein, ether extract and ash contents (Kassahun et al., 2012). But, the ash and fat components of the local fishmeal in this study was higher and protein content was lower than the study by Ojewola et al. (2005).This could be due to the difference in selecting the fish offal parts for local fishmeal processing and the method of reducing the fish oil during processing.

4.2. Feed intake

The reduction in feed intake observed in diet-1 might be due to the remnants of anti-nutritional factors (ANFs) after treatment and relatively higher crude fiber in the beans. High fiber from processing is considered as feed intake limiting factor (Obasuyi and Nwokoro, 2006; Rougière and Carré, 2010). The reason for lower FI of diet-4 during the finisher period was probably due to tilapia’s higher fat content known to have low digestibility by starter birds. One of the major problems associated with the use of fats in poultry nutrition is the inefficient digestion and absorption in young chickens (Al-Marzooqi and Leeson, 1999). The leading feed intake of diet-3 could be due to, relatively, higher palatability than other diets. Previously, Enes Dapkevicius et al. (2007)reported that lactic acid fermentation improves the acceptability of animal feeds.

4.3. Body weight change

The poor growth performance in diet-1 than fish offal based diets could be feed quality difference, which is from the anti-nutrition factors and the reduced non-protein nitrogen content of soybean meal during processing (Ofongo and Ologhobo, 2007; Al-Marzooqi et al., 2009). This finding generally agrees with other observations that an inclusion of animal protein in broiler ration increases performance than plant-sourced protein diets alone (Olomu, 1976; Ojewola et al., 2005). The reason for the highest ADG during the starter period in diet-3 could be due to the fermented fatty acids and amino acids in fish offal became readily absorbable by young birds. Lactic acid fermentation provides fat stability in fish silage and improving acceptability in the animal feed (Enes Dapkevicius et al., 2007). Based on Al-Marzooqi et al. (2010), fermented fish silage is recommended to have some soluble proteins rapidly absorbed and promote an early protein synthesis in chickens. But, during the finisher period, diet-4 was significantly better (p<0.05) in gain than diet-1 and diet-3. The reason could be the physiological adaptation of grower birds in utilizing crude fat in fishmeal diets. Fishmeal is fairly rich in all amino acids including unidentified growth factors and can rectify amino acid deficiency (Ojewola et al., 2005). This finding was in line with literature that none of the animal protein sources were inferior to the plant-based protein (control) (Mikulec et al., 2004; Ojewola and Annah, 2006). Whereas, other scholars reported that the inclusion of fish silage in diets for broiler chicks improved growth similar with soybean meal or fishmeal (McNaughton et al., 1978; Johnson et al., 1985).

4.4. Feed conversion ration (FCR)

The poor efficiency of diet-3 among the rest of the diets could be relative; it's better palatability and lowers CP content than the fish meal (diets 2 and 4). Besides, higher ash content among fish offal based diets than diet-1 could be the reason for reducing their feed conversion efficiency. The lower efficiency of the experimental birds than the standard of the same Hubbard classic birds could be the feed quality, housing condition, water intake, temperature stress, cell stress and general management of birds (Moges et al., 2011).

4.5. Carcass components

The results obtained showed that higher live weights led to higher dressed weights which agree with other findings (Tesfaye et al., 2012). Lighter birds in diet-1 relatively with the larger surface area were covered with feather as much as the heavier birds do. The carcass weight in Hubbard classic birds in this study was similar to other reports (Gangwar et al., 2010; Girma et al., 2011; Tesfaye et al., 2012). The lower abdominal fat accumulation in diet-3 (0.91) than fishmeal-based diets (diet- 4 (1.01) and diet-2 (0.98)) could be an indication of the efficiency of diet-3 in producing quality lean meat since most carbohydrate (CHO) was replenished during fermentation of fish silage. The lowest fat accumulation in diet-1 birds could be due to feed intake deprivation. Based on Kubena et al. (1974) environmental temperature results in higher percentage of abdominal fat The weather fluctuation in the study area might have a contribution to lowering the overall abdominal fat of the experimental birds. The weight of gizzard in fish offal based meals (ranged 1.98- 2.17) was similar to the findings of Ojewola et al. (2005) that the fishmeal and crab meal diets ranged between 2.04 – 2.49%.Similar gizzard weights in diet-1 and diet-3 and also diet-2 and diet-4 might be due to the texture of the meals that the former were finer and the later coarser, respectively. An increase in muscular activity in the gizzard occurs breaking down more coarse meal in diets compared to the finer meal (Etuk et al., 2012).

4.6. Mortality rate

The highest mortality rate in diet-1 could probably be due to the disease occurrence during the second week of the trial and the presence of ANFs and toxic effects from plant source ingredients in the diet. A similarcase was previously observed when birds fed on treated beans (Gangwar et al., 2010). The minor incidence of lameness, like improper growth of phalanges and deformed legs observed in fish offal based meals, could be relatively due to their heavy, faster weight gain that limited movement.

5. Conclusion

Finally, from the above results, it can be concluded that fish species difference had no negative effect on the overall performance of the experimental birds except local tilapia meal which was relatively less effective for starter birds implying the potential use of fish-offal for poultry feed. The substitution of full-fatted soybean meal by fish offal meal (at 5%) had no negative effect on the performance of broilers, rather improved plant-sourced protein diet when mixed. Besides, fermented fish silage can be an alternate meal of fishmeal (in diet-2 and diet-4) at 5% inclusion rate for the positive effects of intake and production suitability than fishmeal diets.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest to publish this manuscript in the journal.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge Bahir Dar University, College of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences for allowing us to use the poultry house and overall support rendered. We are also thankful for Professors who had supported us in different endeavors.

References

Agunbiade, J., Tolorunji, B. and Awojobi, H. (2004). Shrimp waste meal supplementation of cassava products based diet fed to broiler chickens. Nigerian Journal of Animal Production 31(2): 182-188.
Al-Marzooqi, W., Al-Farsi, M., Kadim, I., Mahgoub, O. and Goddard, J. (2010). The effect of feeding different levels of sardine fish silage on broiler performance, meat quality and sensory characteristics under closed and open-sided housing systems. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 23(12): 1614-1625.
Al-Marzooqi, W., Kadim, I. and Mahgoub, O. (2009). Ileal Amino Acids Digestibility Coefficients of Fish Silage, Fish Meal and Soyabean Meal in Broiler Chickens. World Poultry Science Association (WPSA), 2nd Mediterranean Summit of WPSA, Antalya, Turkey, 4-7 October 2009: 459-464.
Al-Marzooqi, W. and Leeson, S. (1999). Evaluation of dietary supplements of lipase, detergent, and crude porcine pancreas on fat utilization by young broiler chicks. Poultry science 78(11): 1561-1566.
Ann, G., Demssie, S. and Tadesse, M. (2007). Marketing system of fish from Lake Tana Ethiopia. Opportunity for marketing and lively hoods. Report, World fish Bahir Dar, Ethiopia, ARARI (Amhara Region Agriculture Research Institute).
AOAC (2000). Official Methods of Analysis. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Maryland, USA., Gaithersburg.
Choct, M. (2009). Managing gut health through nutrition. British poultry science 50(1): 9-15.
CSA (2013). Report on Livestock and Livestock Characteristics (Private peasant holdings).Statistical bulletin, Agricultural sample survey /2012/13/. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, Central Statistical Agency.
Degebassa, A., Badee, S. and Tigabu, Y. (2008). Effect of fishmeal processing on feed quality for livestock in Zeway, Oromia (Ethiopia). ESAP-Proc, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, ESAP.
Enes Dapkevicius, M., LN, Nout, M. R., Rombouts, F. M. and Houben, J. H. (2007). Preservation of Blue-Jack Mackerel (Trachurus Picturatus Bowdich) Silage by Chemical and Fermentative Acidification. Journal of food processing and preservation 31(4): 454-468.
Etuk, I., Udoh, U., Ogbuewu, I. and Okoli, I. (2012). Carcass and organ characteristics of broilers fed crab meal as replacement to fish meal. International Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development 15(2): 982-987.
FAO (2003). FAO Fishery Country Profile: (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations) Ethiopia. Rome, Italy, FAO.
FAO (2013). Aquatic waste treatment and utilization. Fisheries and aquaculture treatment, http:// www.fao.org/docrep/003, retrieved on September 2014.
Gangwar, S., Ebrahim, A. and Gebremariam, H. (2010). Evaluate the performance of broiler chicken on substituting bean meal with soya bean meal. Asian Journal of Experimental Biological Sciences 1(4): 881-885.
Garcia, Y., Boucourt, R., Acosta, A., Albelo, N. and Nunez, O. (2007). Effect of a probiotic mixture of Lactobacillus acidophillus and Lactobacillus rhamnosus on some health and physiological indicators in broilers in the tropics. Cuban Journal of Agricultural Science 41(1): 69-72.
Gebremedhin, B., Hirpa, A. and K., B. (2009). Feed marketing in Ethiopia. Results of rapid market appraisal. Nirobi, Kenya, Improving Productivity and Market Success (IPMS) of Ethiopian farmer project Working paper, 15. ILRI (International Livestock Research Institute).
Girma, M., Urge, M. and Animut, G. (2011). Ground Prosopis juliflora Pods as Feed Ingredient in Poultry Diet: Effects on Growth and Carcass Characteristics of Broilers. International Journal of Poultry Science 10(12): 970-976.
Google-Earth (2013). Google Earth for windows, release version 1.3.25.5. . USA, Google Inc.
Hassen, H., Neser, F., De Kock, A. and van Marle-Köster, E. (2009). Study on the genetic diversity of native chickens in northwest Ethiopia using microsatellite markers. African journal of Biotechnology 8(7).
Johnson, R. J., Brown, N., Eason, P. and Sumner, J. (1985). The nutritional quality of two types of fish silage for broiler chickens. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 36(11): 1051-1056.
Kassahun, A., Waidbacher, H. and Zollitsch, W. (2012). Proximate composition of selected potential feedstuffs for small-scale aquaculture in Ethiopia. Livestock Research for Rural Development 24(6).
Klasing, K. (2007). Nutrition and the immune system. British poultry science 48(5): 525-537.
Kubena, L., Wchen, F. J. and Reece, F. N. (1974). Factors influencing the quality of abdominal fat in broilers. III. Feed and dietary levels. Poultry science 53(1): 974-978.
McNaughton, J., May, J., Reece, F. and Deaton, J. (1978). Broiler Chick Utilization of Hydrolyzed Fish-Protein. Poultry science, Poultry Science Assoc Inc 1111 North Dunlap Ave, Savoy, IL 61874.
Mikulec, Z., Mas, N., Masek, T. and Strmotic, A. (2004). Soybean meal and sunflower meal as a substitute for fish meal in broiler diet. Veterinarski arhiv 74(4): 271-280.
Moges, F., Nega, M., Assefa, H., Yetayew, A. and K., Z. (2011). On farm evaluation of broilers for their adaptability and productivity at small holder level at Bahir Dar city, Ethiopia. . Proc. of the 6th and 7th annu. regional confe. on completed livestock research activities Andassa Livestock Research Center, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia.
Obasuyi, J. and Nwokoro, S. (2006). Physical and chemical characteristics of breadfruit (Artocarpus altilis) seeds collected from three locations in Edo State, Nigeria. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition 5(3): 212-214.
Ofongo, S. T. and Ologhobo, A. D. (2007). Processed Kidney Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) in Broiler Feeding: Performance Characteristics, University of Ibadan. Department of Animal Science, Nigeria.
Ojewola, G. and Annah, S. (2006). Nutritive and economic value of Danish fish meal, Crayfish dust meal and Shrimp waste meal inclusion in Broiler Diets. International Journal of Poultry Science 5(4): 390-394.
Ojewola, G., Okoye, F. and Ukoha, O. (2005). Comparative utilization of three animal protein sources by broiler chickens. International Journal of Poultry Science 4(7): 462-467.
Olomu, J. (1976). Determination of optimum protein and energy levels for broiler chicks in the tropics. Nigerian Journal of Animal Production 3(1): 177-183.
Ristic, M., Filipovic, S. and Sakac, M. (2001). Liquid Protein Feedstuff from Freshwater fish by-products as a Component of Animal Feed. Roumanian Biotechnological Letters - an international journal: 729.
Rougičre, N. and Carré, B. (2010). Comparison of gastrointestinal transit times between chickens from D+ and D- genetic lines selected for divergent digestion efficiency. Animal 4(11): 1861-1872.
Sumarsih, S., Yudiarti, T., Utama, C., Rahayu, E. and Harmayani, E. (2010). The influence of using fish fermented by lactic acid bacteria as feed substitution on serum lipid profile of broilers. Journal of the Indonesian Tropical Animal Agriculture 35(2): 124-128.
Tesfaye, E., Animut, G., Urge, M. and Dessie, T. (2012). Moringa olifera leaf meal as an alternative protein feed ingredient in broiler ration: Effect on growth performance and economic consideration. International Journal of Poultry Science 12(5): 289-297.
Tesfaye, W. (1998). Biology and management of fish stocks in Bahir Dar Gulf, Lake Tana, Ethiopia, Ph. D. dissertation, Wageningen Agricultural University, The Netherlands.
Tibbetts, G. W., Seerley, R., McCampbell, H. and Vezey, S. (1981). An evaluation of an ensiled waste fish product in swine diets. Journal of Animal Science 52(1): 93-100.
Windsor, M. and Barlow, S. (1981). Introduction to fishery by-products, Fishing News Book Ltd.
Wiseman, J. (1987). Feeding of non-ruminant livestock, Butter worth Co. Ltd., London.
Wondie, A. (2010). Improving management of shoreline and riparian wetland ecosystems: the case of Lake Tana catchment. Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology 10(2): 123-131.