Weed-bed Macro-invertebrate Composition and Abundance in Relation to Water Hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes (Mart) Solms) in the North-Eastern Lake Tana, Ethiopia

Wondie Zelalem*1, Demeke Kifle2, Seyoum Mengistu2 and Ayalew Wondie3

1 College of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, Bahir Dar University, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia
2 College of Natural Science, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
3 College of Science, Bahir Dar University, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia
Corresponding author: wondiehm@gmail.com

Received: July 12, 2016
Accepted: December 28, 2017

Abstract: The composition and abundance of weed-bed macro-invertebrates were assessed using data from Lake Tana from September, 2012 to May, 2013. Higher weed-bed macro-invertebrates density (6395ind/m2 inaverage) was recorded in the weed-infested sites. Ephemeroptera was the dominant taxa in weed-infested sites while Hemiptera in the non-infested sites. Statistically there were no significant spatial variations in the density of weed-bed macro-invertebrates in the weed infested and non-infested sites except coleopteran. Seasonally, however, Ephemeroptera, Diptera and Coleoptera showed highest peak density during the dry season in the weed-infested site. While, Hemiptera and Basommatophora, during the rainy reason and Diptera during post rainy season showed peak density in the non-infested sites. The results obtained from Hilsenhoff-Family Level Biotic Index H-FBI categorized site Ribas the highest organic and nutrient polluted site while site Debre-Sinaas the least perturbed site. Though, the results of H-FBI did not show clear difference between the weed-infested and non-infested sites, the observed spatial disparity in taxa may be explained by the variation in the density of prey items, interstitial space for refuge, and presence of predators coupled with small variations in physico-chemical factors. Presence of higher density of beetle species of the families Dytiscidae and Hydrophylidae at the leaf and root interface of water hyacinth seemed to have association between them. Therefore, further investigation is recommended to see their effect and interactions with the weed so as to use those beetles as biological agent to control the weed.

Keywords: Biotic index; niche diversity; organic pollution; tolerance level; weed

1. Introduction

Ecological effects of Invasive Alien Species (IAS) on inland water ecosystems vary significantly depending upon the invading species, the extent of the invasion, and the vulnerability of the ecosystem being invaded (Levine, 2000). Loss and degradation of biodiversity due to IAS can occur at all levels of biological systems, extending from species to ecosystem levels, and may involve major alterations to the physical habitat, water quality, essential resources and ecological processes. These effects can vary in terms of the lapse of time between the initial introduction and subsequent spread of an IAS, the severity of its effect, the likelihood of synergistic interactions with other threatening processes, and the potential for initiation of a cascade of effects ramifying throughout an entire ecosystem (Levine, 2000; Shuvra, 2013).

Aquatic plants are ideal habitats for macro-invertebrate colonization (Arti et al., 2015). However, non-native species such as water hyacinth, through restricting the photosynthetic activities of other aquatic macrophytes via shading effect, may seriously alter the ecosystem functions that other macrophytes provide (Luken and Thieret, 1997). Comparative studies on non-native species, water hyacinth and native species show that native macrophytes supported different macro-invertebrate assemblages (Toft et al., 2003).

On the other hand, water hyacinth mat at the edge of open water or the presence of few water hyacinth plants support highest density of macro-invertebrates as compared to other rooted emergent vegetation (Barker, 2011). Therefore, this study was aimed to identify the major changes in the composition and abundance of weed-bed macro-invertebrate community in temporal and spatial bases, comparing water hyacinth-infested areas with non-infested areas of the lake and check the degree of perturbation using community characteristics and structure of macro-invertebrates.

2. Materials and Method

2.1. The study area

Lake Tana is found in the Abay basin in the north-western highlands of Ethiopia at an elevation of 1800m which is the largest (3150 km2) freshwater body (Eshete et al., 2002). It is a shallow lake with a mean depth of 8m and with a volume of 28,000km3 (Margareta 2015). Its water level depends on the volume of the outflow to Blue Nile River and, the recently constructed Tana-Beles hydropower and irrigation scheme and the volume of inflow from the tributary rivers especially during the main rainy season. The lake has eight permanent inflowing rivers (Gilgel Abay, Rib, Gumara, Dirma, Megech, Gelda, Arno-Garno and Enfranz), which contribute more than 95% of the inflow (Tenalem, 2009). The Lake is meso-oligotrophic, turbid and frequently mixed with short duration of thermocline (Eshete et al., 2004). The climatic condition of the lake region is characterized by four seasons: post-rainy season, main rainy seasons, dry season and pre-rainy season (Eshetie, 2003). The rainfall pattern is also uni-modal. Mean annual rainfall varies from 947.9 to 1274.2 mm with a mean value of 1102.1 mm. Long-term rainfall distribution data indicates that most of the rain occurs in July followed by August. The mean annual air temperature of the lake area varies between 19.02oC and 22.68°C. Maximum temperature was occurred in March and April and the minimum in December and January (Wondie, 2013).

2.2. Sampling sites and procedures

Sampling was carried out once during each of the four seasons. Sampling stations were selected on the basis of the extent of invasion by the weed and subsequently categorized as infested and non-infested stations (Table 1 and Figure 1).

Table 1. Description of sampling stations
Sampling sites
Site description
Depth Range (m)
Coordinates
Latitude
Longitude
Water hyacinth infested site
Addisgie-Dingie (Ad) Close to Megech river mouth 0.42 - 0.62 12° 16' 15.3''N 37° 22' 55.7''E
Achera (Ac) Close to a farm land 0.56 - 1.21 12° 16' 59.9''N 37°21' 43.5''E
Kerigna (Kr) Sand beach close to a farm land 0.28 - 1.60 12° 07' 29.4''N 37° 36' 22.1''E
Non-weed infested site
Rib (Rb) Close to Rib river mouth 0.15 - 0.60 12° 02' 24.9''N 37° 35' 53.8''E
Dirma (Dr) Close to Dirma river mouth 0.65 - 1.50 12° 15' 49.6''N 37° 18' 18.5''E
Debresina (Db) Conserved wetland close to the monastery of Debre-Sina 0.98 - 2.30 12° 14' 33.5''N 37° 18' 01.2''E


Figure 1. Map of Lake Tana and its catchment areas with sampling sites [Water hyacinth infested sites]

2.2.1. Measurement of physico-chemical parameters

Dissolved Oxygen (DO), pH, specific conductance, Total Dissolved Solid (TDS), salinity and temperature were measured in situ using YSI 556 multi-probe system. Transparency of the water was measured by lowering a 30 cm diameter circular disc (Secchi disc) with a calibrated cable into the water column.

Measurements of Ammonia (NH3-N) were based on an indophenol method, Phosphate (PO4-P) based on Palintest Phosphate LR method and silica (SiO2) using Ammonium Molybdate in the form of tablet at 640 nm wave length and Nitrate (NO3-N) based on Palintest Nitratest method and Total hardness based on a unique colorimetric method using Hardicol No.1 and No.2 tablets at 570 nm wave length and were carried out using a portable water analysis kit (Wagtech International, Palintest transmittance display photometer 5000). Nutrient analyses were made in the shore area immediately after sample collection using water samples filtered through Whatman GF/F.

2.2.2. Weed-bed Macro-invertebrate

Weed-bed Macro-invertebrates were collected using aquatic deep net with an effective area of 0.07065 m2 and mesh size of 500 µm from the surface of water with Macrophytes (Barbour et al., 1999). Samples were collected four times (in September and December 2012, and March and May, 2013) at weed infested and non-infested areas, concurrently the physico-chemical measurements were also done. Triplicate samples were collected from each site within 3 seconds in 3 meter intervals to avoid disturbance. All three samples collected in a station were combined to obtain a composite sample. The samples were, then, preserved in 95% ethyl alcohol and all the dislodged organisms were carried by the water into the net. Then, the net was removed from the water with an upward scooping motion to prevent any of the organisms it contained to wash away; after which the contents of the net were poured into a bucket with water. All debris and organisms were handpicked from the net. The above procedures were then repeated for the collection of the second and third samples within the same station. The macro-invertebrates were carefully separated from the substrate (if present) using forceps in the Bahir Dar Fishery & Other Aquatic Life Research Center. This study was limited to the identification of the aquatic macro-invertebrates to the family level for consistency among samples.

2.3. Statistical analysis

For macro-invertebrate communities, Non-parametric Kruskal–Wallis test was employed to see temporal differences of organisms counted, whereas the Mann–Whitney test was used for pair-wise comparisons when testing spatial variations between the two sites. Hilsonhoff-Family level Biotic Index (H-FBI), which is an average of tolerance values of all the macro-invertebrates families in a sample, was employed. H-FBI was calculated according to Mandaville (2002).The relationship between the abundance of macro-invertebrate taxa with physico-chemical variables was assessed by using a multivariate analysis tool, Redundancy Analysis (RDA), using CANOCO for windows version 4.5 and verified by Pearson’s correlations.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Weed-bed Macro-invertebrates Composition and Abundance

In this study, a total of 19,218 individuals from the weed-infested and 10,320 individuals from non-infested sites were collected, which belong to 4 classes, 10 orders and 29 families. Ephemeroptera, with two families, was the dominant taxon, which accounted for 55% of the total macro-invertebrate density in the weed-infested sites, followed by Diptera and Coleoptera, with four and five families that accounted for 18% and 12%, respectively. In the non-infested sites, Hemiptera was the dominant taxon, which accounted for 26% of total macro-invertebrate density (Figure 2). In Lake Tana, dominancy of Ephemeroptera and Hemiptera was reported by Dereje (2009) before the infestation of water hyacinth. In this investigation, however, Ephemeroptera was the most dominant in the weed-infested sites, while Hemiptera was prominent in the non-infested sites. Caenidae and Baetidae (Ephemeroptra), Coenagrionidae (Odonata), Dytiscidae and Hydrophilidae (Coleoptera), and Chironomidae (Diptera) had higher density in the weed-infested site than the non-infested sites. On the other hand, Corixidae (Hemiptera) showed higher density in the non-infested sites.

Figure 2. Percentage contribution of different weed-bed macro-invertebrates of the total macro-invertebrate density

No significant spatial variation was observed in the density of weed-bed macro-invertebrates except coleopteran, which exhibited significant differences between the weed-infested and non-infested sites (Mann-Whitney test, p<0.05). Seasonally, Ephemeroptera, Diptera and Coleoptera showed the peak density (1853, 704 and 416 ind/m2, respectively) during the dry season in the weed-infested site. Hemiptera and Basommatophora during the rainy reason and Diptera during the post rainy season showed peak density (651, 293 and 200 ind/m2, respectively) in the non-infested sites (Figure 3). In both sites, density of weed-bed macro-invertebrates was lowest during the pre-rainy season. Ephemeroptra and Coleoptera showed significant seasonal variations in the weed-infested sites (Kruskal Wallis test, p<0.05). In this investigation, generally higher abundance of macro-invertebrates was observed in the weed-infested sites. Particularly, higher density of both Caenidae and Baetidae (Ephemeroptera), Dytiscidae and Hydrophylidae (Coleoptera) and Chironomidae (Diptera) was favored by the presence of water hyacinth. The fact that most of their larvae were collected from the complex root structure indicates the fibrous root structure of water hyacinth creates favorable niche diversity. Similar findings were also reported by Villamagna (2009). Floating aquatic plants including water hyacinth support many macro-invertebrates, especially at the edge of the floating mat (Rocha-Ramirez et al., 2007). The positive relationship between surface areas of floating macrophytes and epiphytic macro-invertebrates was also reported by Brendonck et al. (2003) and Rocha-Ramirez et al. (2007).

Hilsenhoff (1988) categorized the pollution level of a water body into seven based on scores obtained from the macro-invertebrates density and tolerance value (0 to 10). Based on the scores obtained from weed-bed macro-invertebrates; sites Kr and Db with H-FBI scores of 6.06 and 6.49, respectively, had substantial organic pollution, which signifies fairly poor environmental condition. While sites Ac, Ad and Dr with H-FBI scores of 6.88, 6.50, and 6.65, respectively, had poor environmental condition. However, site Rb with H-FBI score of 7.78 was likely to have suffered from severe organic pollution, which signifies a very poor environmental condition (Table 2.).

 


Figure 3. Seasonal trends of weed-bed macro-invertebrates density in the weed infested sites (a & b) and non-infested sites (c & d)
Note: RS = rainy season, PORS = post rainy season, DS = dry season, PRS = pre-rainy season

Nevertheless, the overall results obtained from H-FBI showed that site Rb had the highest organic and nutrient pollution while site Db had the least. The results of this biotic index did not show clear difference between the weed-infested and non-infested sites. However, the observed spatial disparity in taxa may be explained by the variation in the density of prey items, interstitial space for refuge, and presence of predators coupled with small variations in physico-chemical factors (Jonathan, 2001).

Table 2. Composition and abundance of weed-bed macro-invertebrates and their pollution tolerance level and H-FBI scores for the study sites
Order / Family
Tolerance level
Weed-infested sites Abundance
Non-infested sites
(ind./m2)
Average
H-FBI
Abundance (ind./m2)
Average
H-FBI
Ac
Ad
Kr
Dr
Db
Rb
Ephemeroptera
5264
2274
2744
3427
464
1416
640
840
Caenidae
7
5160
1825
312
2432
2.70
80
928
176
395
0.87
Baetidae
4
104
449
2432
995
0.63
384
488
464
445
0.56
Basommatophora
272
130
368
257
0
1064
112
393
Planorbidae
7
200
80
96
125
0.139
0
296
0
99
0.219
Physidae
8
16
40
272
109
0.138
0
424
112
179
0.453
Lymnaeidae
6
56
10
0
22
0.021
0
344
0
115
0.218
Odonata
352
420
904
559
64
1208
112
461
Aeshnidae
3
24
1
64
30
0.014
0
360
0
120
0.114
Coenagrionidae
9
328
419
760
502
0.716
64
720
104
296
0.844
Libellulidae
9
0
0
80
27
0.038
0
128
8
45
0.129
Coleoptera
384
395
1528
770
0
1000
24
341
Psephenidae
4
0
0
16
5
0.003
0
0
0
0
-
Elmidae
5
0
1
0
1
0.001
0
0
0
0
-
Dytiscidae
5
320
266
584
390
0.309
0
424
0
141
0.224
Hydrophilidae
5
40
120
928
363
0.287
0
552
24
192
0.30
Staphylinidae
-
24
8
0
11
-
0
24
0
8
-
Diptera
984
793
1624
1134
768
272
336
460
Chironomidae (Blood-red)
8
320
72
1368
587
0.74
720
216
144
360
0.912
Chironomidae (other)
7
656
718
240
538
0.511
48
8
0
19
0.035
Ceratopogonidae
6
0
0
0
0
-
0
8
0
3
0.005
Culicidae
8
0
3
0
1
0.001
0
32
192
75
0.189
Tabanidae
6
8
0
16
8
0.007
0
8
0
3
0.005
Lepidoptera
0
0
8
3
-
0
0
0
0
-
Pyralidae
5
0
0
8
3
0.002
0
0
0
0
-
Hemiptera
88
55
296
148
112
216
2312
879
Naucoridae
5
56
0
0
19
0.015
8
0
16
8
0.013
Nepidae
8
0
0
32
11
0.013
0
16
8
8
0.02
Gerridae
-
0
8
0
3
-
56
104
40
67
-
Belostomatidae
10
8
0
72
27
0.04
0
48
16
21
0.067
Corixidae
9
0
7
120
42
0.06
0
0
1744
581
1.66
Veliidae
6
0
0
32
11
0.01
48
0
0
16
0.03
Mesoveliidae
-
0
40
8
16
-
0
32
272
101
-
Notonectidae
-
24
0
32
19
-
0
16
216
77
-
Rhynchobdellida
48
15
104
56
-
0
112
0
37
-
Glossiphoniidae
8
48
15
104
56
0.07
0
112
0
37
0.09
Unionoida
40
0
0
13
0
0
0
0
Sphaeridae
8
40
0
0
13
0.013
0
0
0
0
-
Araneae
40
8
48
32
16
16
8
13
Pisauridae
-
40
8
48
32
-
16
16
8
13
-
Total (mean of three sites)
6.48
6.97

3.2. Relationship between physico-chemical variables and density of weed-bed Macro- invertebrates

The relationship of physico-chemical variables with weed-bed macro-invertebrate density is shown in Figure 4. In this Redundancy Analysis, the first two axes accounted for 74.4% of the cumulative percentage of variance in species–environment relationship. Axis 1 accounted for 48.7 % of the variation and show strong positive correlation with phosphate, ammonia and temperature and negative correlation with total hardness, silica, TDS, salinity and dissolved oxygen concentration. Similarly, Axis 2, which accounted for 25.7% of variance, was showed positive but weak correlation with Secchi depth, nitrate, phosphate, dissolved oxygen and silica, and negative correlation with total hardness, pH and temperature concentrations.

Density of Hemiptera was strongly correlated with DO and silica (r = 0.99 and 0.96, respectively, at p<0.01) and with salinity and TDS (r = 0.91 and 0.90, respectively, at p< 0.05), respectively. Lepidoptera showed strong positive correlation with ammonia (r = 0.92, p<0.01). Similarly, Araneae showed strong positive correlation with temperature (r = 0.85, p<0.05). Odonata, Coleoptera and Rhynchobdellida showed strong but negative correlation with total hardness (r = -0.97, -0.95 and -0.97, respectively, at p<0.01).


Figure 4. Graph for Redundancy Analysis (RDA) demonstrating the relationship between macro-invertebrate taxa from weed-bed and physico-chemical variables
Note: Ephemopt = Ephemeroptera, Coleopte = Coleoptera, Lepidopt = Lepidoptera, Unionoid = Unionoida, Rhynchob = Rhynchobdellida, Basommata = Basommatophora, T0 = temperature, TDS = total dissolved solids, sp. cond = specific conductance, sal = salinity and Total Ha = total hardness

4. Conclusion

Though the variation was not statistically significant, higher weed-bed macro-invertebrate diversity and abundance was observed in the weed-infested sites. This may indicate that the presence of water hyacinth mats in the lake did not affect weed-bed macro-invertebrate fauna, which inhabit mainly the uppermost water column. However, the observed density variation between the two sites was due to slight variations in physico-chemical variables together with the availability of abundant food, diverse niche and refuges, which favored their abundance and diversity. In general, the existing water hyacinth biomass did not pose significant effect on lake macro-invertebrates composition and abundance. During this investigation, relatively high density of beetle species of the families Dytiscidae and Hydrophylidae, were observed at the leaf and root interface of water hyacinth. They could be possible biological agents for controlling water hyacinth proliferation. Therefore, further investigation is recommended to see their effect and interactions with the weed.

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank Amhara Regional Agricultural Research Institute (ARARI) and Ethiopian Nile Irrigation and Drainage (ENID) Project for their financial support. I also would like to acknowledge Bahir Dar Fishery and Other Aquatic Life Research Center and its staffs; Adane Melaku, Beniam Hailu, Bezashe Berbo for their unreserved assistance in the field and laboratory works. Other staffs including Endalamaw Asress (boat driver), Habtamu Muchie and Habtamu Degu (car drivers) are also acknowledged.

Reference

Arti, S., Sharma, K.K. and Meenu, S. (2015). Alternanthera philoxeroides (alligator weed) as a habitat of macro invertebrate fauna in a freshwater pond of Jammu district, (J&K). International Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Studies; 3(1): 81-85.
Ayalew, W., Seyoum, M., Jacobus V. and Eshete, D. (2007). Seasonal variation in primary production of a large high altitude tropical lake (Lake Tana, Ethiopia): Effects of nutrient availability and water transparency. Journal ofAquatic Ecology 41:195–207.
Barker, J.E. (2011). .Invertebrate assemblages associated with water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) roots in the waccamaw river, South Carolina. M.Sc. thesis, Coastal Carolina University, Conway
Brendonck L., Maes J., Rommens W., Dekeza N., Nhiwatiwa T., Barson M., Callebaut V., Phiri C., Moreau K., Gratwicke B., Stevens M., Alyn N., Holsters E., Ollevier F. and Marshall, B. (2003). The impact of water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) in a eutrophic subtropical impoundment Lake Chivero, Zimbabwe. II. Species diversity. Archiv Fur Hydrobiologie 158: 389-405.
Dereje, T. (2009). Distribution and abundance of Macro-benthic and weed-bed faunas in the Northern part of Lake Tana, Ethiopia. Proceedings of the First Annual Conference of EFASA. pp: 99 - 116.
Eshete, D.(2003). Ecology and potential for fishery of the Small Barbs (Cyprinidae, Teleostei) of Lake Tana, Ethiopia. Ph.D. Thesis, Agricultural University. Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Eshete, D. ,Rutjesa, H.A., de Graafa, M., Nagelkerkeb, L.A.J. Ossea J.W.M. and Sibbinga, F.A. (2002). The ‘small barbs’ Barbus humilis and B. trispilopleura of Lake Tana (Ethiopia): Are they ecotypes of the same species? Environmental Biology of Fishes 65: 373–386
Eshete, D., Vijverberg, J., Sibbing, F.A. (2004). Temporal and spatial distribution of micro-crustacean zooplankton in relation to turbidity and other environmental factors in a large tropical lake (Lake Tana, Ethiopia). Hydrobiologia 513: 39–49.
Hilsenhoff, W.L. (1988). Rapid field assessment of organic pollution with a family level biotic index. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 7:65-68.
Jonathan, C.M. (2001). Factors influencing the composition of faunal assemblages in rainforest stream pools. Ph.D. Thesis, Griffith University, Queensland, Australia
Levine, J.M. (2000). Species diversity and biological invasions: Relating local process to community pattern. Science 288: 852-854.
Luken, J.O. and Thieret, J.W. (1997). Assessment and management of plant invasions. Springer, New York, 324p.
Mandaville, S.M. (2002). Benthic macro-invertebrates in freshwaters-Taxa tolerance values, metrics, and protocols. Soil and Water Conservation Society of Metro Halifax. http://chebucto.ca/Science/SWCS/SWCS.html.
Margareta, S. (2015). Accumulation of poly- and perfluoroalkylated substances (PFASs) and mercury in fish tissue from Lake Tana, Ethiopia – Evaluation of human exposure due to increased fish consumption. Department of Earth Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, 50p.
Rocha-Ramirez, A., Ramirez-Rojas, A., Chavez-Lopez, R. and Alcocer, J. (2007). Invertebrate assemblages associated with root masses of Eichhornia crassipes (Mart.) Solms-Laubach in the Alvarado Lagoonal System, Veracruz. Journal of Mexico Aquatic Ecology 41: 319-333.
Shuvra, S. (2013). The culture of exotic fish species with its ecological impacts in mymensingh. M.Sc. Thesis, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh,79 p.
Tenalem, A.(2009). Natural Lakes of Ethiopia. Addis Ababa University press, Addis Ababa, 206p
Toft, J.D., Simenstad, C.A., Cordell, J.R. and Grimaldo, L.F. (2003). The effects of introduced water hyacinth on habitat structure, invertebrate assemblages, and fish diets. Estuaries 26: 746–758.
Villamagna, A. (2009). The ecological effects of water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) on Lake Chapala, Mexico. Ph.D. Thesis. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia, 194p.
Wondie, Z. (2013). Assessment of water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes (Mart) Solms) in relation to water quality, composition and abundance of plankton and macro-invertebrates in the north-eastern part of Lake Tana, Ethiopia. M.Sc. Thesis, Addis Ababa University, Adiss ababa, 119 p.