A study of the Quality of Kenyan Cotton rotor Spun Yarn

  • Josphat Igadwa Mwasiagi Ethiopian Institute of Textile and Fashion Technology, Bahir Dar University, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia School of Engineering, Moi University, Kenya
  • Lusweti Kitiyu University of Eldoret, Eldoret, Kenya
  • Mbwana Suleiman Ndaro Tanzania Industrial Research and Development Organization (TIRDO), Dar es salaam, Tanzania
  • Ambrose Kiprop School of Science, Moi University, Eldoret
Keywords: cotton, rotor spinning, quality, fiber

Abstract

The textile industry has been identified as one of the key industries which could spur industrial growth in Kenya. Efforts are being made by the Kenyan government and other institutions to revive the textile industry. One area which could contribute towards the revival of the Kenyan Textile industry could be the optimization of the cotton processing in Kenya. Cotton processing includes ginning, spinning, weaving and wet processing. In cotton spinning, the Kenyan industry uses ring and rotor spinning technologies. While ring spinning is the traditional spinning process, rotor spinning has established itself as a great competitor especially when dealing with course counts. This paper looks at the quality of cotton rotor spun yarns, in comparison with the uster standards. While the Kenyan cotton lint reported good quality characteristics when compared to Uster standards, the quality of the rotor spun yarn was poor especially for yarn evenness and hairiness. It is therefore recommended that the rotor spinning process adapted to spin the Kenyan yarn should be carefully evaluated so as to unearth the sources of the shortfall in yarn quality.

References

World Bank, World Development Indicators 2011, CD-ROM, World Bank, Washington DC, 2011.

Klein, W., (1987). The Technology of Short staple spinning, Short Staple Spinning Series, The Textile Institute, Manchester

Lawrence, C. A., (2003). Fundamentals of spun yarn technology. CRC Press, New York.

H.M. Ghorashi, H.M., (1999). New generation of High Volume instrument, 58th plenary meeting of ICAC, Charleston, USA.

Uster,(2007). Uster Statistics 2007. Wilstrasse, Switzerland.

Mangialardi, G.J., Lalor, W.F., Bassett, D.M., & Miravalle, J., (1987). Influence of Growth Period on Neps in Cotton, Textile Research Journal, 57(7), 421-427.

Frydrych, I., Matusiak, M. & Swiech, T. (2001). Cotton Maturity and Its Influence on Nep Formation, Textile Research Journal, 71(7), 595-604.

Lord, P.R. (2003). Handbook of yarn technology science, technology and economics, Boca Raton, Fla. CRC.

McCreight, D., Feil, R.W. Booterbaugh, J.H. & Backe, E.E. (1997). Short Staple Yarn Manufacturing. Durham, North Carolina: Caroline Academic Press.

Saville, B.P. & Manchester, E. (1999). Physical testing of textiles. Cambridge, England: Woodhead Publishing, Ltd, in association with the Textile Institute.

Moghassem, A.R. & Bahramzadeh, H. (2010). Textile Research Journal, 80(20), 2176-2187.

Azzam H.A. & Mohamed, S.T. (2005). Autex Research Journal, 5(4), 246-258.

Nawaz, S., Jamil, N.A., Iftikhar, M. & Farooqi, B. (2002). International Journal of Agriculture & Biology, 4(2), 256-258., 2002.

Rieter. Imperfections (thin places, thick places, neps) - Rieter. Rieter - Rieter. Retrieved February 3, 2011, from http://rieter.com/cz/rikipedia/articles/rotor- spinning/technology/yarn-structure-and- physical-textile- characteristics/imperfections-thin-places- thick-places-neps/print/

Published
2019-06-06
Issue
Vol. 1 No. 1 (2019)
Section
Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).