The Ethiopian Journal of Social Sciences Volume 7, Number 1, May 2021
49
Dynamics of Land Use/Land Cover Change and its Implications for Land Degradation in
Mida Woremo Watershed, North Central Ethiopia
Abrham Atile
1
,
Solomon Asfaw
2*
and Solomon Tekalign
2
Abstract
Land use/land cover change has been the most widely observed phenomenon in Ethiopian
highlands over many decades. This study analyzed dynamics of LULCC and its implication for
land degradation measures over a period of 45 years (1972 to 2017) in Mida Woremo watershed
in the north central Ethiopian highlands. The study used remote sensing data including Land sat
MSS (1972), Land sat TM (1986), Land sat ETM+ (2000) and Land sat OLI (2017). In addition,
a total of 175 sample households residing in the watershed were selected from three kebeles
namely Behera, Ketemana Dere, and Dengora using a systematic random sampling technique
for questionnaire surveying, and supported it with the qualitative data gathered using focus
group discussion and key informant interview. A supervised classification approach based on
maximum likelihood classifier was employed to classify 1972, 1986, 2000 and 2017 images
based on 238 ground truth points, and identified five major land use/land cover classes. These
include cultivated land, settlement land, bare land, forest cover and bush land. A weighted
average index (WAI) was used to assess farmers’ perceptions of causes of LULC changes and
impacts on the biophysical environment. The results indicated that the watershed has undergone
significant land use/land cover from 1972 to 2017. Over the last 45 years, the areas of
cultivated, settlement and bare land were increased by an average growth rate of 5.98%,
97.06%, and 0.48% per year, respectively. These changes were at the expense of the forest and
bush land covers that decreased at an average rate of 1.9% and 1.41% per year, respectively.
The observed land use/land cover changes were driven by a combination of proximate and
underlying driving forces. These include expansion of agriculture and settlement areas, which
increased the demand for woody vegetation. This resulted in a decline in soil fertility and native
vegetation, which led to land degradation. Therefore, proper land use and land management
practices should be in place that take the biophysical and socio-economic set-up of the area into
consideration and that ensure the livelihood of the people and maintain the ecosystem in the
watershed.
Keywords: Ecosystem, highlands, land degradation, land use/land cover, watershed
1
Department of Geography and Environmental Studies, Kebridhar University, Ethiopia
2 School of Geography and Environmental Studies, Haramaya University, P. O. Box 138, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
The Ethiopian Journal of Social Sciences Volume 7, Number 1, May 2021
50
1. Introduction
Land use/land cover (LULC) change has been a great concern over decades due to its profound
effect both on natural and human systems. It is one of the major indicators of global
environmental change through changing ecosystem processes, hydrological cycle and surface
energy balance (Zhou et al., 2008; Terefe et al., 2017; Liu et al., 2017). At a local level, LULC
changes have varying effects including soil degradation and loss in biodiversity, which lead to
the risk of land degradation (Falcucci et al., 2007; Birhan and Assefa, 2017). The circumstances
of these changes, however, vary in spatial and temporal dimensions as a result of multiple
processes evident in specific human-environment conditions. Given the profound impact that
LULC change has on biophysical environment and human livelihoods, its future management
and sustainability would require proper understanding at a local level.
Soil degradation through water erosion which is the manifestation of land degradation has been
one of the global environmental issues that threaten both developing and developed countries.
Though it is a natural phenomenon and has persisted on earth for a long period, the problem has
become very serious in recent decades. Human activities primarily from forest clearing for
agricultural use are a key factor for excessive soil erosion worldwide. According to the Food and
Agriculture Organization’s (FAO, 2016) report, the decline in global forests is estimated to be
around 129 million ha between 1990 and 2015, representing an annual rate of loss of 1.3%.
LULC change inducing soil erosion contributes about 83% of the global degraded land and
affects a total land area estimated to be around 1094 million ha (Kachouri et al., 2013).
Agricultural land is the primary source of soil erosion at global level though the rate varies from
region to region. For example, average soil erosion from agricultural land is estimated 5-70 t ha
-1
yr
-1
in the United State, 0.3-40 t ha
-1
yr
-1
in India and 150-200 t ha
-1
yr
-1
in China (Panagos et al.,
2015; Li et al., 2016). In Ethiopia, on average 42 t ha
-1
of land is eroded annually from cultivated
lands (Bishaw, 2001).
The Ethiopian highlands (elevation >1500 m above sea level) generally accommodate more than
85% of the population, about 95% of the total cultivated land and generate the bulk of the crop
production of the country (Daniel et al., 2016; Terefe et al., 2017). In addition to its favorable
climatic conditions for settlement and agriculture, it is one of biodiversity hot spots representing
ecological space for mountain ecosystem. For example, the highlands of Ethiopia alone
The Ethiopian Journal of Social Sciences Volume 7, Number 1, May 2021
51
contribute more than 50% of the tropical Afromontane vegetation in Africa (Lemenih, 2005).
This plays an important role in balancing the ecology of the catchment and in maintaining the
downstream biodiversity, in addition to its numerous economic, social and cultural benefits
provided to the society at the local scale (Derege et al., 2014). However, greater proportions of
these forest covers and their biodiversity have changed or are lost completely due to human
activities. Reports suggest that over 50% of the Ethiopian highlands have been severely degraded
due to factors related to LULC changes (Bishaw, 2001; Hurni et al., 2010).
Land use/land cover changes are the result of both human and natural factors though human-
induced factors have increased through time. Human-induced LULC change factors such as
expansion of agricultural land and urban development at the cost of vegetation cover have
increased through time on a global scale (Hanssen et al., 2014; Liu et al., 2017; Wakijira et al.,
2020). In Ethiopia, deforestation for intensive farming is a major driver for LULC changes, and
is exacerbated by population growth. Several studies conducted in Ethiopia (Belay, 2002;
Asmamaw et al., 2012; Amare, 2015; Wubie et al., 2016; Tesfa and Triphati, 2016; Birhan and
Asefa, 2017) indicated that deforestation has resulted from traditional intensive farming and
population pressure has been a major cause for existing LULC changes. For example, Wubie et
al. (2016) showed a massive decline in forest cover between 1957 and 2005 in the Gumara
watershed, northwestern Ethiopia. Recently, urbanization and urban land expansion in Ethiopia
(Eleni et al., 2013) due to government policy has been implemented at the cost of urban
vegetation and has a great implication for local climate change and deterioration of soil and
surface water quality. Despite a large number of LULC related studies in Ethiopia particularly in
the highlands of Ethiopia, the rates and magnitude of change vary from place to place and time to
time as a result of multiple processes shown to be working in specific human-environment
conditions (Garedew et al., 2009).
However, there is still a lack of reliable information about spatial and temporal dynamics of
LULC changes, causes and impacts at a local level. Spatially, explicit information that shows
environmental changes at a watershed level may help to take appropriate management measures
and understand the future scenarios of the changes at a regional level. The objective of this study,
therefore, was to investigate the dynamics of land use/land cover changes between 1972 and
The Ethiopian Journal of Social Sciences Volume 7, Number 1, May 2021
52
2017 period and examine its implications for land degradation in Mida Woremo watershed in the
north central Ethiopian highlands.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Description of the Study Area
This study was conducted in the Mida Woremo watershed of North Central Highlands of
Ethiopia. Specifically, it lies between 10
0
10
00
’’
to 10
0
30
00
’’
N latitude and 38
0
50
00
’’
to 39
0
20
43’’ E longitude (Fig. 1), and covers an area of about 68,280 ha. The area is situated about
225km away from the capital city, Addis Ababa, and about 785km from Bahir Dar, the capital
city of the Amhara Regional State. The elevation of the watershed ranges from 1261 to
275m.a.s.l. The watershed is characterized by sloppy and rugged topography where the upper
part of the watershed is characterized by steep slope and dissected mountains whereas the lower
part of the watershed is dominated by gentle slope and plain surface. The Mida Woremo
watershed is the origin of the Jemma River which is one of the tributaries of the Abay (Blue
Nile) River.
Figure 1: Location map of the study area
The Ethiopian Journal of Social Sciences Volume 7, Number 1, May 2021
53
Based on agro-climatic zonal classifications, the study area is described as a tropical sub-humid,
and semi-arid climatic zone (Daniel, 1977). According to the data from the National
Metrological Services Agency (NMSA) recorded for thirty years at Degollo station, the mean
maximum temperature of the three hottest months, and mean minimum temperature of the three
coldest months are 6
0
C and 24
0
C, respectively (Fig. 2). The study area is characterized by mono-
modal rainfall pattern where it receives higher amount of rainfall during July to August.
Figure 1: Mean monthly maximum and minimum temperature and mean monthly rainfall records
from Degollo Meteorological Station from 1985 to 2017
According to the Central Statistical Agency (CSA, 2007), the total population of the watershed
was 220,608, of which 110,240 were men and 110,368 were women. Among the total
population, it was reported that about 207,511 (94%) were rural inhabitants and the remaining
13097(6%) were urban dwellers. Agriculture is the main economic activity and a source of
livelihood in the study watershed. The farming system is mixed crop-livestock production on a
subsistence level. The major crops grown in the area are cereals including sorghum, maize, teff,
wheat, and barley.
The Ethiopian Journal of Social Sciences Volume 7, Number 1, May 2021
54
2.2. Research Methodology
This study was primarily dependent on remote sensing data to see the trajectory of LULC
change, and triangulated the result with the data obtained through socio-economic surveying.
Therefore, the study employed mixed methods research design where both quantitative and
qualitative data were used concurrently in the research procedure. Mixed methods research
represents more of an approach to examining a research problem than a methodology (Mardy et
al., 2018), and enhances the synergy and strength that exists between quantitative and qualitative
data, and helps to understand a phenomenon more fully than independently using quantitative or
qualitative methods alone. According to Creswell (2007), the mixed design encompasses more
than simply combining qualitative and quantitative methods but, rather, reflects a new
epistemological paradigm that occupies the conceptual space between positivism and
interpretivism.
2.2.1. Data sources and methods of collection
Remote sensing and acquisition techniques
The study used both multi-date and multi-scale satellite imageries including Landsat MSS
(Multispectral Scanner), Landsat TM (Thematic Mapper), LandsatETM+ (Enhanced Thematic
Mapper Plus) and Landsat8 OLI (Operational Land Imager) taken for the years 1972, 1986, 2000
and 2017, respectively. These dates were selected on the basis of major historical events, state
policy reforms, and availability of satellite imageries. All theremote sensing data were freely
downloaded from the United States Geological Survey (USGS) web-pages
(http://earthexplore.usgs.gov.com).
As part of the image pre-processing, the Landsat images used for this study were processed for
geometric and radiometric corrections to reduce the effects of atmospheric and terrain factors.
Accordingly, each image was geometrically corrected based on well-distributed Ground Control
Points (GCPs) identified in the field and 1: 50,000 topographic maps, and validated the accuracy
within 0.5 Root Mean Square Error (RMSE). To reduce radiometric errors, images were
calibrated using the radiometric correction technique based on the method used by Liu et al.
(2017). Following this, the study area was selected from each period of the satellite images using
the shape file of the watershad boundary. False colour composition (band 4, band 3, and band
The Ethiopian Journal of Social Sciences Volume 7, Number 1, May 2021
55
2) was applied for each image to improve the visibility and interpretability of the images. To
ensure consistency between datasets, all the satellite images were projected to the similar spatial
reference system and applied Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM), WGS84 Spheroid and
Datum with Zone 37N for projection.
In this study, ground truth was carried out in January, 2017, and this almost coincided with the
season where the majority of the satellite images were taken for the area. A total of 340 ground
truth sample points was collected in the field stratified proportional to the LULC classes. The
sample points were expanded using Google Earth and the remote sensing image where 238
(70%) of the total samples were used as reference data to classify the images, and the remaining
30% (102) sample points were randomly selected for accuracy assessment. Table1. Description
of major LULC types used in this study
No.
LULC Types Description
1 Bare land Area with very little or no vegetation cover on the surface of the land. It
consists of vulnerable soil to erosion and degradation. It also includes
bedrock which is unable to support cultivation.
2 Forest cover
Areas covered with dense natural and plantation forest. It includes
eucalyptus trees, junipers procera, and mixed indigenous tree species.
3 Bush land
Areas covered with small trees mixed with shrubs, grasses; less dense
than forest.
4 Cultivated land Areas used for crop cultivation both annually and perennially. This
category includes areas covered with crop, and land under preparation.
5 Settlement Areas covered with residential houses both rural and urban. This
category includes small and large buildings, roads, administrative
buildings, and small industrial areas.
A supervised classification approach based on maximum likelihood classifier was employed to
classify 1972, 1986, 2000 and 2017 images. Image classification for 2017 satellite image was
conducted based on the ground truth points collected from field surveys and Google Earth
whereas ancillary data such as historical maps, aerial photographs,and information gathered from
local communities in the field helped to classify the 1972, 1986 and 2000 satellite images.
Finally, the study identified five major LULC categories (Table 1) for Mida Woremo watershed.
The Ethiopian Journal of Social Sciences Volume 7, Number 1, May 2021
56
Accuracy assessments for classified images were made in this study due to the fact that LULC
maps derived from remote sensing imagery always contain some sort of errors associated with
the classification techniques or error inherited from the satellite itself (Zhou et al., 2008). In this
study, accuracy assessment was carried out based on randomly selected 102 sample points.
However, constraints in reference data to crosscheck all multi-temporal data, the study validated
the accuracy exclusively for classified images of 1986 and 2017. While the study used the
ground truth data collected from the field and other supplementary data such as Google Earth as
a reference to validate the classified image of 2017, aerial photograph and topography sheets
(1:50,000 scale) were used as a reference for 1986 classified images. Finally, four statistical
parameters including user accuracy, producer accuracy, overall accuracy and kappa coefficient
were reported to validate the accuracy of 1986 and 2017 classified images.
2.2.2. Sampling and socio-economic data collection methods
The target population of this study was smallholder farming households who resided in Mida
Woremo watershed, which is part of the Weremo Wajituna woreda. The woreda is represented
by 30 kebeles (2 urban and 28 rural) and three agro-ecological zones (Dega, Woyina Dega and
Kolla). The sampling method employed for this study was a multi-stage sampling technique in
such a way three kebeles were first selected purposely since they were found within the
watershed and represented three agro-ecological zones. These kebeles were Behera, Ketemana
Dere, and Dengorafrom Dega, Woyina Dega and Kollaagro ecological zones, respectively. A
total of 1750 households were identified from three kebeles from a list provided by woredas. A
10 percent sample size was determined for this study with 95 percent confidence level and 10
percent level of precision (sampling error = 0.07). The sample size was determined based on
Mardy et al. (2018) suggesting that the ideal sample size for a population more than 1000.
Accordingly, a total of 175 sample households were selected from the list using a systematic
random sampling technique (taking n
th
household from the sampling frame at k interval) for
questionnaire surveying.
The items in the questionnaire focused on four themes: (1) Socioeconomic characteristics, (2)
Farmers’ perceptions of causes of LULC changes, and (3) Farmers’ perceptions of impacts of
LULC changes on soil degradation. In addition, focus group discussions (FGDs) and face-to-face
interviews were conducted to triangulate the data from the questionnaires. Three focus group
The Ethiopian Journal of Social Sciences Volume 7, Number 1, May 2021
57
discussions were conducted, one per kebele, each comprising eight persons, and a total of six key
informant interviews; two key informant interviews per kebele were conducted. The focus group
discussions were composed of community leaders, elders, women and youth groups; and the
participants were selected purposively for the FGDs to provide information related to LULC
changes and the present and past social and economic status of the area to strengthen the
reliability of the questionnaire.
2.2.3. Method of data analysis
Analysis of LULC change dynamics
This study was primarily based on remote sensing data take nat different periods. The study
produced LULC map for four separate periods (1972, 1986, 2000, and 2017) and calculated the
area cover in terms of hectare for each LULC category. The rate of LULC change between the
two successive periods was also calculated to show the trend in LULC changes according to
Peng et al. (2008) procedures:
=
− 
× 100% [1]
Where, P is the percentage of LULC changes between two consecutive years, and A
and
are
the areas of one LULC type at the initial year (i) and at the final year (f) of the study period,
respectively.
Similarly, the study used the single land use dynamicity model to evaluate the dynamic in LULC
change, and analyze the annual changing rate based on the following formula used in Sun et al.
(2016):
=
− 
×
1
T
× 100% [2]
Where, R stands for the dynamic degree of LULC in a certain study time, and T stands for the
length of the considered period.
The Ethiopian Journal of Social Sciences Volume 7, Number 1, May 2021
58
Analysis of LULC conversion
Figure 3: A flow chart showing data and methods employed in this study
Image 1972 Image 1986 Image 2000 Image 2017
Image pre-processing
Image Classification
Accuracy assessment
Filed data
LULC
map 1972
LULC map
1986
LULC
map
2000
LULC map
2017
GIS overlay
GIS overlay
GIS overlay
Output table
1972-1986
Output table
1986-2000
Output table
2000-2017
Change detection matrix
LULCC b/n 1972-
1986
LULCC b/n 1986-
2000
LULCC b/n
The Ethiopian Journal of Social Sciences Volume 7, Number 1, May 2021
59
The analysis of the LULC change detection was based on post-classification comparison of
independently classified LULC maps of 1972, 1986, 2000 and 2017. To this end, a cross-
tabulation method was conducted using a spatial overlay of the two LULC maps to show change
detection (Figure 3). The output table was further processed in Excel to quantify the LULC
change matrix, and statistical analysis was applied that described loss, gain, net change and net
persistence.
Analysis of socio-economic data
In addition, socio-economic data collected through household survey was analyzed. In this study,
a weighted average index (WAI) was used to assess farmers’ perception of the causes of LULC
changes and impacts on the biophysical environment and human livelihoods in the watershed.
Weighted average index was previously applied to assess household perception levels issues
related to environmental changes (Ndamani and Watanabe, 2016; Mardy et al., 2018). In this
study, a four-point rating scale (Likert scale) was used and asked the households to score using
0-3, i.e. (high, medium, low, or none with a corresponding score of 3, 2, 1, and 0, respectively).
A weighted average index (WAI) was computed for each cause and effect based on the following
formula (Eq. 3):
 =
[3]
Where: F= Frequency; W= Weight of each scale; i= weight (3= high effect; 2= medium effect;
1= low effect and 0=no effect)
On the other hand, the qualitative data gathered using key informant interviews and FGDs were
analyzed and interpreted using qualitative techniques in the form of thematic narrations.
3. Results and Discussion
3.1 LULC Proportions for the Study Periods
The study identified five major LULC types for each period (1972, 1986, 2000 and 2017) in
Mida Woremo watershed. These included bare land, bush land, cultivated land, forest cover,
settlement and built-up areas. The LULC maps were produced for different periods, and the
The Ethiopian Journal of Social Sciences Volume 7, Number 1, May 2021
60
extent of each LULC categories is presented in Figure 4 and Table 2. The spatio-temporal
variation in the distribution of LULC generally resulted in the formation of typical patterns of
LULC in the study watershed. Between 1972 and 1986, the area of bush land was the largest,
cultivated land was second and settlement/built up was the least. However, the area of cultivated
land was the largest, followed by bush land and bare land; and the least was forest cover in the
2017 LULC map.
The results further indicated that between 1972 and 2017, cultivated land and settlement/built-up
areas increased progressively in their sizes whereas the sizes of bush land and forest cover
decreased during the same period in the watershed. As a result, the proportion of cultivated land
and settlement covers increased respectively from 17% and 0.07% in 1972 to 62.84% and 2.98%
in 2017. The finding agrees with Temesegn and Tesfahun (2014), who reported an increase of
cultivated land by 72.7% between 1985 and 2011 in the east of Lake Tana, northern Ethiopia.
Similarly, in their studies Eleni et al. (2013) reported continuous increases of settlement areas
over 40 years in the Koga Catchment, northwestern Ethiopia.
Table 2. Areas of LULC categories for Mida Woremo Watershed (a total of 68,280 ha)
Year Bare land
ha (%)
Bush land
ha (%)
Cultivated land
ha (%)
Forest Cover
ha (%)
Settlement
ha (%
1972 5,560 (8.14) 42,128
(61.70)
11,622 (17.02) 8,923
(13.07)
45.5 (0.07)
1986 6,558 (9.61) 31,811
(46.60)
22,221 (32.54) 7,507
(11.01)
182.3 (0.28)
2000 7,289 (10.67) 15,637(22.91) 41,592 (60.91) 2,826 (4.14) 936.6(1.37)
2017
6,765(9.91)
15,220(22.19)
42,908 (62.84)
1,353 (1,98)
2,032.5(2.98)
On the other hand, bush land and forest covers decreased, respectively, from 61.7% and 13.07%
to 22% and 1.98% during the same period. The size of bare land showed slight increase during
the study period though the trend was not consistent. This finding was in line with Wubie et al.
(2016), who indicated the decline in bush land, and was in contrast to the work of Birhan and
Asefa (2017), who reported increases of bush land cover between 1964 and 2014 in the Gelana
sub-watershed, Northern Highlands of Ethiopia.
The Ethiopian Journal of Social Sciences Volume 7, Number 1, May 2021
61
The Ethiopian Journal of Social Sciences Volume 7, Number 1, May 2021
62
Figure 4: LULC map for 1972, 1986, 2000, and 2017 in Mida Woremo Watershed
3.2. Accuracy Assessment
The user’s and producer’s accuracy for classified images of 1986 and 2017 are presented in
Table 3. The overall accuracy for 1986 and 2017 classified images was 84.5% and 87.3%,
respectively. The Kappa statistic was 0.83 for 1986 classified image and 0.86 for 2017.
Table 3. Accuracy assessment results for classified images of 1986 and 2017
LULC Types
TM (1986)
OLI (2017)
Producer's
Accuracy
User's
Accuracy
Producer's
Accuracy
User's
Accuracy
Bare land
84.47 77.91 87.84 79.57
Forest Cover
94.47 77.91 100 97.81
Bush land
91. 26 88.67 95. 08 90.37
Cultivated land
85.39 80.65 82.03 80.15
Settlement/Built-up area
73.55 79.5 89.58 86.65
Overall accuracy 84.5
87.3
3.3.
Rate of LULC Change (1972-2017)
The findings indicated that LULC changes occurred at different scale. Overall, during the whole
study period (1972–2017), cultivated land increased by 31285.3 ha (269.2 %), settlement area by
1986.98 ha (4367.9%), forest cover decreased by 7570.2 ha (84.83%), bare land increased by
1204.81 ha (21.7%) and bush land dereased by 26906.86 ha (63.84%) in the study watershed.
Based on the annual rate change results (Table 4), the total area of forest cover decreased at an
annual rate of 1.13% per year between 1972 and 1986, 4.5% per year between 1986 and 2000
and 3.1% per year between 2000 and 2017. The results suggest that on average the extent of
forest cover has decreased at an annual rate of 1.9% from 1972 to 2017. The finding was in line
with the study of Amare (2013), who reported about 73.3% (an annual rate of 2.1%) of forest
cover loss from 1973 to 2008 in Gilgel Abbay watershed, northwestern Ethiopia. Similarly, bush
land cover was reduced at a rate of 1.74% per year, 3.7% per year and 0.16% per year in the
periods 1972-1986, 1986-2000 and 2000-2017, respectively. Generally, bush land cover
decreased on average 1.4% per year between 1972 and 2017. However, the annual rate of change
in bush cover identified in this study was slightly lower compared to the study of Wubie et al.
The Ethiopian Journal of Social Sciences Volume 7, Number 1, May 2021
63
(2016), who reported 91.39% (an annual rate of 1.9 %) between 1957 and 2005 in the Gumara
watershed of Lake Tana basin, northwestern Ethiopia.
Table 4. Percentage of annual rate of LULC change (%/year)
b
Period Bare land Bush land Cultivated
land
Forest
Cover
Settlements
1972-1986 1.28 -1.74 6.52 -1.13 21.5
1986-2000 0.8 --3.7 6.3 -4.5 29.6
2000-2017 -0.42 -0.16 0.18 -3.1 6.9
1972-2017
0.48
-1.41 5.98 --1.9.
97.1
b
Annual rate of change was calculated as
a
divided by the time duration (year) between initial and
final year where
a
is percentage of LULC change between periods was calculated as 100×(A
final year
A
initial year
)/A initial year, where A = area of the LULC type
In contrast, the sizes of cultivated land and settlement area had increased during the period 1972-
2017 (Table 4). On average, cultivated land and settlement area have increased at a rate of 5.98%
per year and 97% per year during this period. These findings agreed with many of the previous
studies conducted in the highland regions of Ethiopia despite the fact that there was variation in
the rate of change among those studies. For example, Gete and Hurni (2001) found a 95%
increase in the area of the cultivated land in the period between 1957 and 1995 in Dembecha
area, Northwestern Highlands of Ethiopia. Similarly, Temsegen and Tesfahun (2014) indicated
that the area of cultivated land increased by 72.7% between 1985 and 2011 in the east of Lake
Tana, Ethiopia.
3.4.
Changes in LULC Conversions
3.4.1. LULC change in the period 1972-1986
From 1972 to 1986, cultivated land showed the highest net increase followed by bare land and
settlement land. The bush land cover was the most unchanged LULC category, whereas
settlement area was persistently the least unchanged LULC category. The net change to
persistence ratio was relatively higher for cultivated land (positive), bare land (positive), bush
land (negative) and forest area (negative) indicating the most dominant trends in changing
watershed. Overall, 53.86% of the total area of the watershed occupied in 1972 was changed in
1986 (Table 5).
The Ethiopian Journal of Social Sciences Volume 7, Number 1, May 2021
64
Table 5. LULC change matrix in Mida Woremo watershed (68,280ha), 1972-1986
From 1972
Bare
land
Bush
land
Cultivated land Forest Settlement Total
1972
Loss
To 1986
Bare land
2.91
3.43 1.74 0.05 0.01 8.14 5.23
Bush land 4.29
31.40
21.20 4.65 0.15 61.69
30.29
Cultivated 2.28 8.32
5.99
0.39 0.04 17.02
11.03
Forest land 0.13 3.46 3.60
5.83
0.06 13.08
7.25
Settlement 0 0.04 0.01 0.01
0.01
0.07 0.06
Unchanged
46.14
Total 1986 9.61 46.65 32.54 10.93 0.27
Gain
6.7 15.25 26.55 5.1 0.26
Net change
1.47 -15.04 15.52 -2.15 0.2
Net
persistence
0.5 -0.48 2.59 -0.37 0.2
3.4.2. LULC change between 1986 and 2000
Table 6 shows the conversion matrix of the LULC change from 1986 to 2000. Accordingly, the
cultivated land showed the highest net increase, followed by settlement area. While cultivated
land, bush land and bare land were relatively the most persistent LULC categories, forest cover
and settlement land were the least persistent LULC categories. The net change to persistence
ratio was higher for cultivated land (positive), bush land (negative), forest land (negative) and
settlement land (positive) indicating the most dominant trends in changing watershed. Generally,
almost half (50%) of the total watershed occupied in 1986 remained unchanged between 1986
and 2000.
Table 6: LULC change matrix in Mida Woremo watershed (68, 280 ha), 1986-2000
From 1986
Bare
land
Bush
land
Cultivated land Forest Settlement Total
1986
Loss
To 2000
Bare land
5.04
0.26 4.12 0.07 0.12 9.61 4.57
Bush land 4.35
15.31
25.17 0.75 1.02 46.60 31.29
Cultivated 1.17 2.82
26.96
1.39 0.20 32.54 5.58
Forest land 0.10 4.53 4.42
1.92
0.02 10.99 9.07
Settlement 0.03 0.02 0.18 0.02
0.01
0.27 0.25
Unchanged
49.24
Total 2000 10.69 22.94 60.85 4.15 1.37
Gain
5.65 7.63 33.89 2.23 1.36
Net change
1.08 -23.66 28.31 -6.84 1.11
Net
Persistence
0.21 -1.54 1.05 -3.56 1.11
The Ethiopian Journal of Social Sciences Volume 7, Number 1, May 2021
65
3.4.2. LULC change between 2000 and 2017
Table 7 indicates the conversion matrix of the LULC change during 2000-2017. During this
period, cultivated land showed the highest net increase, followed by settlement land. Cultivated
land, bush land and bare land were relatively the most persistent LULC categories, whereas
forest cover and settlement area were the least persistent LULC categories. The net change to
persistence ratio was higher for cultivated land (positive), settlement land (positive), forest cover
(negative) and bare land (negative) indicating the most dominant LULC categories in changing
watershed. Overall, 37.68%, of the total area of the watershed has undergone LULCC, whereas
the remaining 62.32 % of the total watershed remained unchanged between 2000 and 2017.
Table 7: LULC change matrix in Mida Woremo watershed (68,280 ha), 2000-2017
From 2000
Bare
land
Bush land Cultivated
land
Forest Settlement Total
2000
Loss
To 2017
Bare land
4.40
2.02 4.09 0.00 0.18 10.69 6.29
Bush land 0.46
11.34
9.47 1.12 0.55 22.94 11.6
Cultivated 4.77 8.14
45.84
0.12 1.96 60.83 14.99
Forest land 0.16 0.60 2.47
0.74
0.17 4.14 3.40
Settlement 0.12 0.19 0.96 0.02
0.00
1.37 1.29
Unchanged
62.32
Total 2017 9.91 22.29 62.84 1.98 2.98
Gain
5.51 10.95 16.99 1.26 2.86
Net change
-0.78 -0.65 2.00 -2.14 1.57
Net
Persistence
-0.17 -0.06 0.04 -2.89 1.57
Where, bolded diagonal elements in italics (Table 5, 6, and 7) represent proportions of each
LULC category that was unchanged (persistent). The loss column and gain row indicate the
proportion of the LULC that experienced gross loss and gain in each categories, respectively. All
the figures in the table are presented in percentage except net persistence, which is a ratio.
3.5.
Driving Forces of LULC change
The driving forces of LULC in the watershed are basically associated with human-induced
factors. The results indicated that between 1972 and 2017, cultivated land and settlement/built-up
areas progressively increased, whereas there was a decrease in the sizes of bush land and forest
cover. It is believed that the influence of human activities such forest clearing for agriculture and
demand for firewood and house construction had a greater contribution to LULC changes in the
socio-economic context of Ethiopia.
The Ethiopian Journal of Social Sciences Volume 7, Number 1, May 2021
66
According to the results obtained from sample respondents in the household surveying (Table 7),
urbanization ranked first for being the cause of LULC changes with a WAI of 2.71, followed by
expansion of agricultural land (WAI=2.63), increasing demand for firewood and construction
(WAI=2.59), and insecure land tenure rights (WAI=2.25). The influence of human activities on
LULC changes has accelerated with population growth. This is because population pressure and
environmental changes have direct relationship and immediate implications for local livelihood
by changing the land cover into different land use units.
Table 7: Farmers’ perceptions of causes of LULC changes in the watershed (N=175)
Variables
Causes
Rank
High Moderate Low None WAI
Expansion of agriculture 134 22 15 4 2.63 2
Demand for firewood and construction 127 30 12 6 2.59 3
Urbanization 145 18 9 3 2.74 1
Insecure land tenure rights 121 32 20 2 2.25 4
Code: High =3, Moderate=2, Low=1, None=0.
Source: Households Survey, 2017
According to the Central Statistical Agency census reports of 1994 and 2007, the size of the
population in the study woreda was projected to grow at an annual rate of 3.51 and is expected to
double in 2040. This may lead to further increases in the demand for natural resources in the
area. According to the information obtained from key informant interviews and FGDs, it is
anticipated that the number of the population will increase from time to time and has already
exerted pressure on the existing land resources due to increasing demand for food, firewood,
house construction and other essentials. For example, as the demand for food and shelter
increases, it leads to the expansion of cultivated land and house construction by encroaching on
uncultivated areas including forest cover, bush and bare land.
Many studies conducted in Ethiopia have supported the fact that population growth will be one
of the major driving forces for land use/cover change. For example, in his study Woldamlak
(2002) found the decline in woody vegetation cover due to increasing demand for cultivation,
settlement, and fuel and construction in Chemoga Watershed, Blue Nile Basin, Ethiopia. Similar
studies (Mohamme and Tassew, 2009; Amare, 2013; Woldeamlak and Solomon, 2013; Wubie et
The Ethiopian Journal of Social Sciences Volume 7, Number 1, May 2021
67
al., 2016) discovered that LULC change particularly the decline of forest covers has been
associated with population pressure in many parts of the Ethiopian highlands. Land use/land
cover change has also resulted from insecure land tenure rights mediated by institutional reforms
and policy change. As the information obtained from key informants and FGDs indicated, land
reform policies that the government implemented in 1974 and 1991 also contributed to the
expansion of agriculture and land degradation in the watershed. For example, distribution of land
following the 1975 land to tiller policy and the 1991 EPRDF land redistribution policy resulted
in insecure land ownership and poor resource management among smallholder farmers.
3.6.
Implications of the LULC change for land degradation
One of the manifestations of LULC change is soil degradation which in turn accelerates the risk
of land degradation. The farmers ranked highest the perceived effects of soil degradation that
resulted from LULC change. As shown in Table 8, farmers perceived that soil degradation had
the highest effect on soil fertility decline with a WAI of 2.96, followed by decline in crop
production (WAI= 2.85). These findings have coincided with the findings of Karl et al. (2009)
which stated that decline in crop production resulted from soil degradation because of its
negative impacts on plant growth. On the other hand, this result differs from the finding reported
in Mardy et al. (2018), where the farmers responded that crop decline was the least severe effect
of soil degradation. Increased cost of conservation (WAI = 2.17) was perceived as the last effect;
this may suggest poor soil conservation practices at the household level.
The Ethiopian Journal of Social Sciences Volume 7, Number 1, May 2021
68
Table 8: Farmers’ perceptions of LULC induced soil degradation effects on the watershed
(N=175)
Variables
Effects
Rank
High Moderate Low None WAI
Decline in soil fertility 168 7 - - 2.96 1
Decline in crop production 141 16 18 - 2.85 2
Increased cost of production 152 19 4 - 2.71 3
Food shortage 118 55 2 - 2.65 4
Decline in income 120 37 17 1 2.56 5
Expansion of unproductive land 88 35 49 3 2.17 7
Increased cost of conservation 105 42 23 5 2.39 6
Code: High =3, Moderate=2, Low=1, None=0.
Source: Households Survey, 2017
The current study identified major environmental and socio-economic problems attributed to
LULC changes. The findings indicated that the extent of forest cover and bush land have been
significantly reduced over time in the study watershed. The removal of natural vegetation cover
such as bushes and forests in the study watershed and their conversion to cultivated, bare land
and settlement area without effective land management practices has resulted in the prevalence
of soil erosion. Asmamaw et al. (2012) warned that poor land use/cover management at the
catchment could cause the occurrence of high soil erosion and gullies. Changes in vegetation
cover not only cause the physical removal of soil but also accelerate the degradation of basic soil
properties, which lead to a decline in soil fertility (Warra et al., 2013).
The other manifestation of land degradation resulting from LULC change is the loss of
biodiversity. The findings show that the area under natural vegetation cover has declined over
the past four and half decades in Mida Woremo watershed. In addition to soil erosion risks and
decline in soil quality, decline in vegetation cover may change the native ecosystem leading to
the loss of biodiversity. According to key informant interviews, there were many indigenous tree
species such as Acacia abysssinica (locally called girar), Dodonea angustifolia (kitekita)
,Carissaspinarum (agame), Olea Africana (woyera), Cordia Africana (wanza),
podocarpusfalctus (zigeba), Juniperouspodocarpus (tid), Eucleaschimpera (Dedeho), Ficus sur
(shola) and Ficus vasta (warka) in the Mida Woremo watershed. The Mida Woremo watershed
was also home to many wild animals like apes (locally tota), tigers (nebir), lions (anbesa), foxes
The Ethiopian Journal of Social Sciences Volume 7, Number 1, May 2021
69
(kebero), hyenas (jib) and monkeys (zenjero). However, most of the indigenous tree species and
animals disappeared and the remaining few plant and animal species are on the way to disappear
due to deforestation. For instance, tree species like Olea Africana (woyera), Cordia Africana
(wanza), podocarpusfalctus (zigeba), Juniperouspodocarpus (tid), Ficus sur (shola) and Ficus
vasta (warka) have already disappeared and are only found in protected areas like churches,
monasteries and inaccessible areas of the watershed. As explained by key informants, some
animal species like tigers (nebir), lions (anbesa) and hyenas (jib) which were previously found
in the catchment are not currently there. Though the results of this study coincide with the
findings of many previous studies (e.g., Wubie et al., 2016; Birhan and Asefa, 2017) conducted
in the highlands of Ethiopia, the causes and impacts of LULC changes on biodiversity vary from
place to place.
4. Conclusion
The findings revealed that the study’s watershed has experienced significant LULC changes over
the last 45 years. These changes are attributed mainly to human-induced activities such as
expansion of agricultural lands, increasing demand for firewood and urbanization, which are
exacerbated by population growth. The risks of land degradation have manifested themselves
mainly in the forms of soil degradation through soil erosion and loss of biodiversity. These
resulted in the decline in soil fertility and crop production, increased cost of production,
expansion of unproductive land, a decline in native vegetation and many others. Therefore,
proper land use and land management practices should be in place that consider the biophysical
and socio-economic set-up of the area, and ensure the livelihood of the people and maintain the
ecosystem in the watershed. Proper intervention should be implemented to reduce population
pressure and to apply proper land management practices. This also requires making use of
energy efficient utilities and rural electrification to minimize encroachment upon the land for
firewood and charcoal.
The Ethiopian Journal of Social Sciences Volume 7, Number 1, May 2021
70
References
Amare, S. 2013. Retrospective Analysis of Land Cover and Use dynamics in Gilgel Abbay
Watershed by using GIS and Remote Sensing Techniques, Northwestern Ethiopia. International
Journal of Geosciences4: 1003-1008.
Amare, S. 2015. Land Use/Cover Change at Infraz Watershed, North western Ethiopia. Journal of
Landscape Ecology8 : 70-83.
Asmamaw, L.B., Mohammed, A.A. and Lulseged, T.D. 2012. Land use/cover dynamics and their
effects in the Gerado catchment, northeastern Ethiopia. International Journal of Environmental
Studies, 1-18.
Belay, T. 2002. Land-cover/land-use changes in the Derekolli catchment of the South Welo Zone
of Amhara Region, Ethiopia. Journal of Eastern Africa Social Science Research Review, 18: 1-
20.
Birhan, A. and Assefa A. 2017. Land use/land Cover changes and their environmental implications
in the Gelana sub-watershed of Northern highlands of Ethiopia. Journal of Environmental
System Research, 6: 1-12.
Bishaw, B. 2001. Deforestation and Land Degradation in the Ethiopian Highlands: A Strategy for
Physical Recovery. Northeast African Studies, 8; 7-25.
Daniel, G. 1977. Aspects of climate and water budget in Ethiopia. Addis Ababa University
printing press, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Daniel, M. Woldeamlak B., and R, Lal. 2016. Conservation effects on soil quality and climate
change adaptability of Ethiopian watersheds land degradation and development. Land
Degradation Development. 27: 1603–1621 DOI: 10.1002/ldr.2376.
Derege, T.,Tsunekawa, A., Tsubo, M., Syed, A., Nigussie, H. .2014. Land-use change and its
socio-environmental impact in Eastern Ethiopia’s highland. Regional Environmental Change
14,757-768.
Eleni, Y.Wolfgang W., Michael, E.K., Dagnachew, L., and G. Bloschl. 2013. Identifying Land
Use/Cover Dynamics in the Koga Catchment, Ethiopia, from Multi-Scale Data and Implications
for Environmental Change. International Journal Geo-Information, 2: 302-323.
Falcucci, A., Maiorano, L. and Boitani, L. 2007.Changes in land-use/land-cover patterns in Italy
and their implications for biodiversity conservation. Landscape Ecology, 22: 17-631.
FAO.2016. Global Forest Resources Assessment 2015: How are the World’s Forests Changing?
2nd ed.; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Rome, Italy, 2016.
Garedew, E., Sandewall, M., Soderberg, U., and Campbell, B.M. 2009.Land-use and land cover
dynamics in the Central Rift Valley of Ethiopia. Environment and Management, 44, 683–694.
Hurni, H., Solomon A., Amare, B.,, Berhanu, D., Eva, L., Brigitte, P., Birru, Y, and Gete Z. 2010.
Land degradation and sustainable land management in the highlands of Ethiopia. Global
Change and Sustainable Development, 5: 187-207.
Kachouri, S., Achour, H., Abida, H., Bouaziz, S. 2014.Soil erosion hazard mapping using Analytic
Hierarchy Process and logistic regression: a case study of Haffouz watershed, central Tunisia.
Arab Journal of Geosciences : DOI 10.1007/s12517-014-1464-1.
Karl, T.R., J.M. Melillo, and T.C. Peterson, editors. 2009. Global Climate Change Impacts in the
United States. Cambridge University. Press, Cambridge, UK.
Li, Z., Fang, H. 2016. Impacts of climate change on water erosion: A review. Earth Sci. 163, 94–
117.
The Ethiopian Journal of Social Sciences Volume 7, Number 1, May 2021
71
Lemenih, M., Karltun, E., Olsson, M. 2005. Soil organic matter dynamics after deforestation along
a farm field chronosequence in southern highlands of Ethiopia. Agriculture, Ecosystems and
Environment, 109, 9-19.
Liu, C., Xu, Y., Sun, P., Huang, A., Zheng, W. 2017. Land use change and its driving forces
toward mutual conversion in Zhangjiakou City, a farming-pastoral ecotone in Northern China.
Journal of Environmental Monitoring and Assessements,189; DOI 10.1007/s10661-017-6218-6.
Mardy, T., Uddin, M.N.,Sarker, M.A., Roy, D., Dunn, E.S.2018. Assessing Coping Strategies in
Response to Drought: A Micro Level Study in the North-West Region of
Bangladesh. Climate.6, 23(https://www.mdpi.com/2225-1154/6/2/23
Mohammed, A., and Tassew N. 2009. Land use/cover changes between 1966 and 1996 in
Chirokella micro watershed, Southern Ethiopia. East African Journal of Sciences, 3: 1-8.
Ndamani, F., Watanabe, T. 2016. Determinants of Farmers’ Adaptation to Climate Change: A
Micro Level Analysis in Ghana. Sci. agric. (Piracicaba, Braz.) [online]. 2016, vol.73, n.3,
pp.201-208. ISSN 1678-992X. (http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0103-9016-2015-0163).
Panagos, P., Borrelli, P., Poesen, J., Ballabio, C., Lugato,, E., Meusburger, K., Montanarella, L.,
Alewell, C. 2015. The new assessment of soil loss by water erosion in Europe. Environ. Sci.
Policy 54, 438-447.
Peng, J., Wu, J., Yin, H., Li, Z., Chang, Q. and Mu, T. 2008. Rural Land Use Change during 1986-
2002 in Lijiang, China, Based on Remote Sensing and GIS Data. Journal ofSensors, 8:8201-
8223.
Sun, Q., Zhang, C., Liu, M. and Zhang, Y. 2016. Land use and land cover change based on
historical space–time model. Solid Earth, 7: 1395-1403.
Terefe, T., Feyera, S., Moges, K. 2017. The impact of land use/land cover change on ecosystem
services in the central highlands of Ethiopia. Ecosystem Services, 23; 47-54.
Temesgen, G., and Tesfahun, F. 2014. Evaluation of Land Use/ Land Cover Changes in East of
Lake Tana, Ethiopia. Journal of Environment and Earth Science, 4: 49-53.
Tesfa, W., and Tripathi, D. 2016. Analyses of land use and land cover change dynamics using GIS
and remote sensing during 1984 and 2015 in the Beressa Watershed Northern Central Highland
of Ethiopia. Modeling Earth System and Environment, 2: 1-12.
Wakjira, T., Tamene, A., Miegel, K. 2010. Drivers and Implications of Land Use/Land Cover
Dynamics in Finchaa Catchment, North western Ethiopia. Land 9, 113;
doi:10.3390/land9040113.
Warra, H., Mohammed, A. and Nicolau, M. 2013. Spatio-temporal impact of Socio-economic
practices on land use/land cover in the kasso catchment, Bale Mountains, Ethiopia. Scientific
Annals of “AlexandruIoan Cuza” University of IAŞI, 1: 96-120.
Woldeamlak, B., and Solomon A. 2013. Land-use and land-cover change and its environmental
implications in a tropical highland watershed, Ethiopia. International Journal of Environmental
Studies, 70: 126-139.
Woldeamlak, B. 2002. Land covers dynamics since the 1950s in Chemoga Watershed, Blue Nile
Basin, Ethiopia. Mountain Research and Development, 22: 263-269.
Wubie, M., Mohammed, A., Melanie D.N .2016. Patterns, causes and consequences of land
use/cover dynamics in the Gumara watershed of lake Tana basin, Northwestern Ethiopia,
Environmental System Research, 5: 1-12.
Zhou, Q., Li, B., and Kurban, A. 2008.Trajectory analysis of land cover change in arid
environment of China.International Journal of Remote Sensing, 29, 1093–1107.